Speaking the truth

Coco sometimes finds it difficult to see the wood for the trees when trying to decide what is really important about recent pieces of news speculation over the contents of which has been perhaps been suppressed for six or more years. When the Director of a Government organisation resigns, for personal not political reasons, and on the last working day, 19 June 2026, releases that which had been classified, then you, dear reader, might be forgiven for thinking that perhaps the resignation was political after all, and perhaps more so when the content of the disclosures are considered.

But to think in that way would be to impugn the integrity of the outgoing directress, whom we could not call a whistle-blower for she was acting in her official capacity as Director of National Intelligence of the government of the United States. The press release my be found here: Fauci Funded Wuhan Lab Research That Sparked COVID.

There is also an official video a copy of which may be found on Rumble. If you want to skip the adds this link to the playlist may still work. The link above may cease to work if rumble apply a no-cross-origin policy.

The cache of documents may be found here, but the same links are on the official dni.gov site.
COVID-19 Release Index
COVID-19 Release Part 1
COVID-19 Release Part 2
COVID-19 Release Part 3
COVID-19 Release Part 4

Indulgences

Perhaps Coco may be forgiven for thinking that indulgences had ceased after 31 October 1517 following the posting by Martin Luther of his 95 theses at Wittenberg five hundred years ago, but what do we find? Not only are indulgences still available, there are some who think that even our governments should provide them.

Would you, dear Reader, like permission from your government to break the laws without fine or penalty for four years? You would be free to do whatever you wished, at whatever cost to anyone else, and get away with it. But hold on a moment, if you may obtain such an indulgence from your government, may not another, and another? What then? The other does something that affects, damages and hurts you, and now you have no redress. Is this really a good idea?

But one water company thought that they might just be able to get away with it. Thames Water moves step closer to nationalisation after government objects to rescue deal is a BBC report upon the rejection of the offer from those who feared they may lose the whole of their investment. They stood to lose £20. In effect what they said was, we will write off £10, and put another £10 (but only £3 today) into the business providing you do not fine us for anything we do wrong over the next four years. Well, that gives them enough time to take ‘their’ money (£23) out before the time is up up by way of dividends, management charges and whatever other lawful means there may be, before they throw in the towel. In the meantime, and beyond, who shall pay for all of those unlawful actions for which they shall not have been fined over the next four years?

Coco thought that the internal projections could look like this, which takes no account of interest costs on either the old loans or the new loans:

Projection (each year)
Without
repair work
With
repair work
Charges to customers100100
Direct costs-85-85
Fees-8-8
Repairs-0-10
Fines (for not doing repairs)-0-0
Profit/loss7-3
Taxation (covered by losses)-0-0
Distribution to owners-6-0
Added to/Taken from reserves1-3
Over four years
Amount taken by owners240

Of course the real-world numbers are much bigger than these.

But coming back to Luther, he rightly saw that indulgences are a very bad thing. There are some who claim, as Paul1 tells us, that the teaching that Christ died on the Roman cross for our sins gives us the right to sin as much as we want to do. But no, such is anathema to the work of our Saviour. He died for our sins that we may be put right with God and be changed, given new hearts with which we love God and keep his commandments.

Oh let it be so for you, dear Reader! Do not seek an indulgence, but rather seek the Maker of heaven and and earth through his Son, Jesus Christ, through whom2 you may have the forgiveness of sins and eternal life in his name.

  1. Romans 6:1-4 What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin that grace may abound? Certainly not! How shall we who died to sin live any longer in it? Or do you not know that as many of us as were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptised into His death? Therefore we were buried with him through baptism into death, that just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. ↩︎
  2. John 1:11-13 [Jesus] came to his own, and his own did not receive him, but as many as received him, to them he gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name: who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. ↩︎

Jesus is King

In Psalm 21 we read:

I have set my king on Zion. Three thoughts on the consequences

Jesus is our God and king
He lived and died new life to bring
He shall return judgement to bring
When the trumpet loud shall ring

Jesus lives and is our king
He who died and rose now reigns
He’ll come again judgement to bring
Upon us all as he ordains

Jesus lives! He is the king
Who gave himself for sin to die.
He shall return judgement to bring
Be ready now, the end is nigh!

  1. Why do the nations rage, and the people plot a vain thing?
    The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the Lord and against his anointed, saying,
    “Let us break their bonds in pieces and cast away their cords from us.”
    He who sits in the heavens shall laugh; the Lord shall hold them in derision. Then he shall speak to them in his wrath, and distress them in his deep displeasure:
    “Yet I have set my King on my holy hill of Zion. I will declare the decree:
    The Lord has said to me, ‘You are my son, today I have begotten you. Ask of me, and I will give you the nations for your inheritance, and the ends of the earth for your possession. You shall break them with a rod of iron; you shall dash them to pieces like a potter’s vessel.’ ”
    Now therefore, be wise, O kings; be instructed, you judges of the earth. Serve the Lord with fear, and rejoice with trembling. Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and you perish in the way, when his wrath is kindled but a little.
    Blessed are all those who put their trust in him. ↩︎

Un-Iberian Astrolabe

Coco noted it in a very interesting article about an astrolabe about to be sold at auction:

A 17th Century ‘supercomputer’ once owned by Indian royalty heads for auction
Courtesy Sotheby’s

Supercomputer may be a slight exaggeration, as when quantum computers do get off the ground, those things that presently claim the name of super-computer, and occupy more space than the earliest ideas of what a home computer would require, will be seen to be what they are, mere toys and playthings to amuse the mind. Such a comparison however does not denigrate the beauty and versatility of the astrolabe as an instrument of its time, any more than the more modern calculators the abacus.

The article however itself referenced a place by a relatively modern name giving the impression that its ancient name is a more modern name thereby suggesting perhaps a slight rewriting of history. Coco however hoped that the reference was merely a mistake on the part of the writer of the article perhaps out of ignorance and therefore wrote to the publisher in the following terms:

It was an interesting article about the astrolabe that is about to be sold at Sotheby’s and about astrolabes in general, but your writer appears not to have been aware that Spain was known as Spain before it ever became Andalusia after the incursion of the Vandals. Your writer refers to the land as “al-Andalus (in present-day Spain)”. The Romans used the name Hispania and the Greeks Spania long before the Vandals had any involvement.

It is also curious to note that the name, which is not an English name, appears in a list “Iraq, Iran, North Africa and al-Andalus”. Surely this is inappropriate? Andalusia or Iberia may have made sense, but to use a non-English name is no more correct in an English language article than to use Abertawe or to use Swansea in a Welsh language article. Even though the English or Welsh reader may know the location to which reference has been made it displays a contempt for the language in which the article has been written.

There is a tendency – often attributed to the victors in warfare – to present a one-sided view of history. This is exhibited in our day by the propensity to find opportunities to rewrite history. I hope that this was not such an abuse of the article but merely a mistake on the part of your writer and would look forward to reading a correction. If it were not a mistake but deliberate then one might ask whether there is a contempt not merely for the language in which the article has been written but also for the reconquest of Andalusia.

The paragraph in which the mistake was made reads:

Astrolabes were first developed in ancient Greece in the 2nd Century BCE and spread to the Islamic world by the 8th Century. Over the following centuries, centres of production flourished across Iraq, Iran, North Africa and al-Andalus (in present-day Spain).

Nikhil Inamdar

You, dear Reader, may also note another anachronism in the paragraph. Whilst astrolabes were indeed developed in Greece the Islamic world did not exist before the seventh century AD. According to Islamic tradition its founder died in 632 AD. The incursion into Spain began only during the eighth century. The spreading of the knowledge of astrolabe into the parts of the world that would come to be dominated by Islam would then have taken place whilst those parts of the world, Iran, Iraq and North Africa would have been dominated by, at least nominally, Christian peoples, so that the Muslim world merely inherited the knowledge of the people its leaders had conquered.

Coco therefore reaches a tentative conclusion that there is an attempt to rewrite the history, or if not to rewrite it to sow into the minds of the readers of the article enough to cause them to doubt what any good scholar should know.

Finally, Coco would be glad of further good quality information that you, dear Reader, may have upon the subjects addressed in this article, if you would comment appropriately below.

Beware of your appetite

It was in a BBC article, Your pictures of Scotland: 10 – 17 April, that the thought was provoked in Coco’s head. The article contains several quite delightful photographs including one of a short-eared owl in flight near Caithness, but it was not this that inflamed Coco’s thoughts.

But rather one of some large mammals in a field. The caption catches the attention:

Travelling through Embo, we came across this scene and wondered… just what was it that someone had fed those horses.

Allister Fraser © 2026

Surely we must be careful of our diet. It important for our bodies – too much arsenic may promote an early and unwelcome disorganisation of the machines, processes and factories that maintaining their proper economy enable the organs of the body to function in their vital states but the ingestion of the odd apple or two may, despite the arsenic risk, actually help to keep the doctor away if part of a daily routine.

It is important also for our souls. Peter tells us that as new born babes we are to desire the pure spiritual milk of the Word1. If we do not understand the world in which we live correctly then we shall make mistakes with both inanimate things and animate beings. We shall not treat people as we ought. We shall not live as we ought.

But we are not to remain as those who only drink milk. As new born babes, the apostle said, but babes grow up and need stronger food2. The Apostle writing to one group of believers expresses his disappointment that his readers are still living as babes. Why do they not grow up, he has asked them, that they may be given solid food. He then goes on to tell them what those elementary matters3 are. Some of you if you read the list may wonder why it is that the Apostle calls these things elementary having not understood them. If you do, then you fall into that same group who are still only drinking milk. We are to move on from that.

Paul, elsewhere, writes to the Corinthian church4 telling them also that they had not grown up. Why do they only take milk?

The answer lies in that we have not developed our appetites. The Englishman, though Coco may suppose there may not be many of them now, who has only tasted the bland food of his fathers, will find it hard to swallow the exotic medley of the subcontinent. They have not listened to the words of the Psalmist5. When we consider the works of the Lord both in nature and in the redemption of men by the work of Jesus Christ on the cross, giving himself to pay the penalty for our sins and to prepare the way to lift the curse that lies upon this world6 because of Adam’s7 sin. If we ingest the wrong food, we shall either grow stuntedly, not quite like horses becoming sheep, and in ignorance of the true God.

Let us then feed not only our bodies but our souls, hearts and minds that we may grow in the knowledge of God our Saviour, Jesus Christ, and not remain in ignorance of all that he has done for us by reading his Word, meditating upon it, digesting it, and putting it in practice in our daily living.

  1. Therefore, laying aside all malice, all deceit, hypocrisy, envy, and all evil speaking, as newborn babes, desire the pure milk of the word, that you may grow thereby, if indeed you have tasted that the Lord is gracious. 1 Peter 2:2-3 ↩︎
  2. For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you again the first principles of the oracles of God; and you have come to need milk and not solid food. For everyone who partakes only of milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, for he is a babe. But solid food belongs to those who are of full age, that is, those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil. Hebrews 5:12-14 ↩︎
  3. Therefore, leaving the discussion of the elementary principles of Christ, let us go on to perfection, not laying again the foundation of repentance from dead works and of faith toward God, of the doctrine of baptisms, of laying on of hands, of resurrection of the dead, and of eternal judgment. And this we will do if God permits. Hebrews 6:1-3 ↩︎
  4. And I, brethren, could not speak to you as to spiritual people but as to carnal, as to babes in Christ. I fed you with milk and not with solid food; for until now you were not able to receive it, and even now you are still not able. 1 Corinthians 3:1-2 ↩︎
  5. The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul;
    The testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple;
    The statutes of the Lord are right, rejoicing the heart;
    The commandment of the Lord is pure, enlightening the eyes;
    The fear of the Lord is clean, enduring forever;
    The judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.
    More to be desired are they than gold,
    Yea, than much fine gold;
    Sweeter also than honey and the honeycomb.
    Moreover by them Your servant is warned,
    And in keeping them there is great reward. Psalm 19 ↩︎
  6. For the creation was subjected to futility, not willingly, but because of Him who subjected it in hope; because the creation itself also will be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of God. For we know that the whole creation groans and labours with birth pangs together until now. Romans 8:20-22 ↩︎
  7. Cursed is the ground for your sake; in toil you shall eat of it all the days of your life. Both thorns and thistles it shall bring forth for you, and you shall eat the herb of the field. In the sweat of your face you shall eat bread till you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken; for dust you are, and to dust you shall return. Genesis 3:17-19 ↩︎

Turning heads: “Short-eared owls return to breeding grounds in Caithness

Alice Gordon © 2026

A song for April 2026

When April arose to bring us her help,
Didn’t she know we had run out of kelp?
The salt’s in the sea, the breeze in the air
But kelp is a find if it is anywhere.

Deep in the ocean stramenopiles thrive
Do we not know, they are truly alive
Doing their business, breathing their air
They turn the sun’s light into forests most fair.

When we do find them, they’re dry and forlorn
Looking like daggers on beaches at dawn
Pneumatocysts pop, releasing the air
Which may be much fun for the babe and the bear.

Now what has this kelp to do with your day?
We haven’t so much as an answer to say.
We speak to the sea, the earth and the air
But they do not listen, they have not a care.

When April arose with help on her wing
The kelp on the beaches began to sing
To sing of a day, to sing to the King
Who good gives to all, may he it to you bring.

Sunset over the Phacelia, Northumberland – Alan Leightley

Two doors

You may know the riddle of the two men at the fork in the road. You are walking along the road and you know that there is a fork, one way of which will lead you to Althringham the other to Seudhampton. You wish to reach Althringham. There is only one signpost but both pointers say Althringham, how do you know which way to go?

Well you wait and hope that someone shall pass who will be able to help you. In due course a man comes along the road. You do not know where he comes from or where is he is going, but you do know that a man from Seudhampton will never the tell the truth, and a man from Althringham will always tell the truth.

What question do you ask the man who comes along the road? If he is from neither of the towns you may not be any the wiser, but if he is, you may then know which way to go1.

There is a similar riddle which involves a pair of speaking doors. There is an alternative ending to this to which Coco shall not allude but which you may wish to look up elsewhere. There are no labels on the doors but you know that the one door leads to heaven and the other door leads to hell. The door to heaven always speaks the truth. The door to hell always lies. You are only permitted to ask one question of one of the doors, What question do you ask2?

Both of these riddles point us to a much bigger question. Would you want to spend your days in the place of lies and liars, or in the place where truth is known and valued? Do you want your destination to be in heaven or in hell?

This is one of the most important, perhaps the most important, question for which you must have an answer. How can a man escape the pains of hell, and gain the bliss of heaven?

In this life we walk a road which inevitably leads to a fork in the road. We may reach that fork before we die, but certainly when we die we shall be on one side of the fork or the other. How can we be sure that we are on the road to Althringham, to heaven and not on the road to Seudhampton, to hell?

On our way down the road we meet two men. We shall call them J and M. If you ask the question What is the way to heaven? both of them will say Follow me. How can we know which one tells the truth?

Do we think of the riddle of the two villages or do we think of the riddle of the two doors?

Both of them will help us to understand. M and J both teach that we should live a good, righteous and holy life. There are commands to keep. If we keep them then we shall live. But how shall we keep them? Both recognise that we fall short of the measure.

How then do we know that we have done enough. an old Welsh hymn takes up the the question:

Y gŵr wrth ffynnon JacobA man by Jacob’s well. The hymn pictures the man with a pair of scales in his hand – A’r glorian yn ei law, and asks the question what will turn the scales?

We are at the fork and ask the question, what will turn the scales? If both J and M hold the scales what answer do they give when we ask Will my good works and obedience turn the scales?

When we ask the doors: Does the other door lead to the same place as you? We go through the door that replies No. If it replies Yes it lies.

We ask M, and he replies: Yes, your good works, if there are sufficient, will turn the scales

We ask J, and he replies: No, your good works will not turn the scales but mine do.

The Welsh hymn puts it: O! f’enaid, cais dduwioldeb a dry y glorian hon. My soul! plead [the blood], this will turn the scales. When King David wrote the fortieth psalm he spoke of the work of the one who would come: a body you have prepared for me. I have come to do your will, O God.3 The Lord Jesus Christ came to do his will. It is his perfect obedience to the law and to the Father’s will that earns a righteousness that he can give to us, and in the figurative sense turns the scales for us. His good works count for us.

It is in fact the obedience he showed in his death on the Roman cross where he paid the price for our disobedience and sin that removes the condemnation from us; but we do not need just our sin to be removed we need also to be given a righteousness that cannot fade in order to stand before a holy God.

And of the first riddle, what can we say? We may ask both J and M the question: Where do you live? Jesus replies: I have come down from heaven4 in which are many rooms, I go [now] to prepare a place for you and shall return to take you there.5

What answer can M give? No matter how closely we follow the commands he has given, he understands our hearts: Their foot shall slip in due time6

Do not walk with those who cannot take you to heaven. Walk with him who is the way, the truth and the light7. He shall take you home8.

  1. Which road leads to your town? ↩︎
  2. Does the other door lead to the same place as you do? ↩︎
  3. Sacrifice and offering you did not desire, but a body you have prepared for me. In burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin you had no pleasure. Then I said, ‘Behold, I have come – in the volume of the book it is written of me – to do your will, O God.’ Hebrews 10:5 after Psalm 40:6-8 ↩︎
  4. For I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will of him who sent me. This is the will of the Father who sent me, that of all he has given me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up at the last day.  And this is the will of him who sent me, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him may have everlasting life; and I will raise him up at the last day. John 6:38-40 ↩︎
  5. In my Father’s house are many mansions; if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you to myself; that where I am, there you may be also. And where I go you know, and the way you know.” John 14:2-4 ↩︎
  6. Vengeance is mine, and recompense; their foot shall slip in due time; For the day of their calamity is at hand, and the things to come hasten upon them Deuteronomy 32:35 ↩︎
  7. Jesus said to him, “I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. John 14:6 ↩︎
  8. And Jesus said to him, “Assuredly, I say to you, today you will be with me in Paradise.” Luke 23:43 ↩︎

David

No, not king David this time, but Ashforth of whom it has been said:

“Consider the ministry. You will have lots of time for reading, and will be able to run your own show by thirty.” Such was the claim made by the Rev. David Ashforth, coordinator of the West London Chaplaincy, an ecumenical student ministry at various colleges in West London (UK), including my own Royal College of Music, in the late 1970s. His hope was that at least a few of us students might consider post-graduate study in theology and possibly ordination. Most would continue in sciences, mining, engineering or as with myself in the arts. David made his appeal at a time when many churches in Western Europe and North American still had buildings and could financially support the staff to run their programmes. There was an inkling however, even then, that things were about to change.

Ken Gray, a recently retired Anglican priest and Cathedral Dean living in Kamloops, BC Canada

Coco had wondered from time to time what had happened to David. What was his proper name. It never quite came out of the forgettory that we call a brain.

It was whilst listening to Gavin Ashenden that Coco at the last remembered his name, David Ashforth, and it crossed his mind, or what is left of it, that perhaps this man knows him. Gavin is speaking in this presentation about the failure of one particular man, and one who ought to know better, to cry: Christ is risen. Coco would have thought however that this particular man is one who should be among the respondents to the cry with the response: Christ is risen indeed rather than one who initiated the cry. The fault therefore lies more with the leaders of the Anglican communion who failed to cry with a unified voice: Christ is risen to which he could have properly responded.

Turning to Google, Coco asked the question, but Google found no links between Gavin and David, it did though find Ken Gray’s article, It’s all about leadership — Life in my little town – The church blog, which seems to suggest that the David Ashforth he knew is the one Coco also knew though a few years later than Coco. It is an interesting article. Many of Coco’s peers and friends from Imperial went into the ministry, most as Anglicans and in recent reflections have said similar things to Ken as in “Another group .. continues to leave parish ministry … [to serve] in universities, in health care settings, in prisons and in schools. …they did not find “a good fit” for their skills, … [they] have followed the allure of academia, [etc]” They found a lack of energy (euphemism, Coco considers, for willingness) to commit to the slog. This is not just the case within the Anglican communion, but amongst the non-conformists also. It is undeniable that there are always exceptions.

David ran, perhaps supervised is a better description, AngSoc at Imperial. Memories fade, but he and Coco must have met along with others once a week during the years they were both there. They did not always agree: Your doctrine is most harsh, still rings in Coco’s ears. Had David never read Samuel Rutherford’s letters? See what love the Father has poured out – lavished – upon us1. See how Rutherford uses the Song of Songs to promote the love of God, and provokes the responses of love and adoration in his children. See how the King is overcome, is entranced, enthralled, when his bride comes into his presence even when she turns up sweaty, unkempt and badly in need of a wash2! But as iron sharpens iron3, so his teaching helped to shape and sharpen this writer.

So the question now is – though we are reminded not to ask for whom the bell toll. Coco must also depart4 – is David still with us, or has he completed his race and now waiting in the presence of the Lord for the glorious resurrection when he shall make all things new?

A recently officially retired friend said to Coco: Anglican ministers never retire, they just move on to something new but without pay. So, may the Lord be with Ken Gray, to strengthen his hand in his ministry as he continues to study to shew himself approved as a faithful teacher of his Word5.

  1. Behold what manner of love the Father has bestowed on us, that we should be called children of God! 1 John 3:1 ↩︎
  2. O my love, you are as beautiful as Tirzah, lovely as Jerusalem, awesome as an army with banners!
    Turn your eyes away from me, for they have overcome me.
    Song 6:4-5 ↩︎
  3. As iron sharpens iron, so a man sharpens the countenance of his friend.
    Proverbs 17 ↩︎
  4. Auf Wiedersehen ↩︎
  5. Be diligent to present yourself approved to God, a worker who does not need to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. 2 Timothy 2:15 ↩︎

Theresienstadt

Ilse Weber (1903-1944) was an Austro-Czech composer who wrote this song during her time in Theresienstadt before she left for Auschwitz where she was murdered in the gas chamber with her young son.

Ich wandre durch Theresienstadt,
das Herz so schwer wie Blei.
Bis jäh mein’ Weg ein Ende hat,
Bis jäh mein’ Weg ein Ende hat,
dort knapp an der Bastei.
dort knapp an der Bastei.

Dort bleib ich auf der Brücke stehn
und schau ins Tal hinaus:
ich möcht so gerne weiter gehn,
ich möcht so gerne weiter gehn,
ich möcht so gern nach Haus!
ich möcht so gern nach Haus!

Nach Haus! du wunderbares Wort,
du machst das Herz mir schwer.
Man nahm mir mein Zuhause fort,
Man nahm mir mein Zuhause fort,
nun hab ich keines mehr.
nun hab ich keines mehr.

Ich wende mich betrübt und matt,
so schwer wird mir dabei:
Theresienstadt, Theresienstadt,
wann wohl das Leid ein Ende hat,
wann sind wir wieder frei?
wann sind wir wieder frei?

Whilst wandering through Theresienstadt
My heart as heavy as lead
My way came to a sudden end
My way came to a sudden end
Just by the bastion gate.
Just by the bastion gate.

I linger there upon the bridge
To look out on the vale
I long to walk on further then
I long to walk on further then
I long to go back home!
I long to go back home!

My home – those words are wonderful!
They cause my heart to groan.
They snatched my home away from me.
They snatched my home away from me.
I have nowhere to go.
I have nowhere to go.

Weary I wend my way distressed
Painful is life for me.
Theresienstadt! Theresienstadt!
When truly shall our sorrow end?
When shall we be set free?
When shall we be set free?

© Stuart Moffatt 2026

There is a beautiful snippet of Anne-Sofie von Otter singing Theresienstadt on Boosey’s website.

ChoralWiki and Noteworthy Scriptorium

The copyright of the arrangement and translation is held by Stuart Moffatt (© 2026).
The midi file was produced using Noteworthy Composer.
The mp3/ogg were produced using Myriad software.

Nurnberg

In 1945 several men fled to Christ in the face of the enormity of their sin. Major Henry Gerecke, a Lutheran army chaplain had been appointed to the accused at Nuremberg. His work was recorded by F T Grossmith in his book The Cross and the Swastika.

When Gerecke prepared the Lord’s table, the guards walked out. He reported it in this way: ‘I shall never forget the sight of those three big men kneeling, asking that their sins be forgiven. So convincing was their bearing that the guards said to me, “Chaplain, you’ll not need us. This is holy business.” And they walked out.’ The Cross and the Swastika by F.T. Grossmith is well worth the read – you might need a box of tissues. Some sound recordings are available. There is also a BBC Radio four production, Nuremberg: The Trial of the Nazi War Criminals, which references the work of the chaplain but looks at the trial from a different perspective.

Sound recordings of Gerecke’s work are [temporarily] available here:

  1. Chaplain Corps 5 min: Gerecke introduces himself and provides the background to his appointment
  2. The Colonel 6 min: The work of finding the lost sheep commences
  3. Ribbentrop 4 min: Religion turns to grace
  4. Hess 5 min: Goering takes Gerecke’s part
  5. Raeder 4 min: The Lutheran becomes a Methodist
  6. Von Schirach 4 min: If any one leads one of these little one’s astray…
  7. Dr Frick 6 min: There is much work for a chaplain who meets the families and the lost sheep
  8. Goering 3 min: The face of religion without the power
  9. Death March 3 min: 16 October 1945 I shall see you again
  10. Civic Duty 3 min: Political reflections
  11. The Executed 4 min: Application!