Their foot shall slip in due time

August 4th 2019 West Hill

Deuteronomy 32:35 Their foot shall slip in due time (the word order varies in our English translations)

Introduction

About 3500 years ago the descendants of Jacob were delivered out of the house of bondage in Egypt and started their journey to the Promised Land. The passage (Deutoronomy 31:30-32:52) which was read in your hearing this evening, records Moses’s words spoken to the people before he was to die on Mount Nebo and before Joshua was to lead the people across the Jordan and into the land. At that time they had already tasted the goodness of the land, as two and half tribes had already settled on the east bank of the Jordan.

Let me first of all affirm that this text records for us actual events which took place in real history. We also believe that the record of these events was created in, as we would say today, real time. There are some who would seek to deny this and would want us to believe that this is only myth, albeit a very valuable myth, written many hundreds of years later. But to the contrary we believe, and the Lord confirms to us (no need to say this, ref: the necessity of two or three witnesses – one is the eye-witness on earth the other is the Spirit of God from heaven), that this is a contemporary eye-witness account of the events, as are all of the events – apart from one which man did not observe – recorded for us in the books of Moses.

We have an interesting point to note here, but it is not in one sense our main point. In another sense however it is. Moses had brought the people out of Egypt, and perhaps at the beginning of their journey there would have been the expectation that Moses would also be the one to take them into the Promised Land. But that was not to be.

Whilst they were in the wilderness Moses had taught the people much about the necessity of sacrifice and of the kind of sacrifice that was acceptable to God. If a sacrifice were to be an acceptable sacrifice, it had to be a sacrifice without blemish. The apostle returns to this in the letter to the Hebrews (7:27) when introducing us to the sacrifice to end all sacrifices: [Jesus, our high priest], does not need daily to offer sacrifices first for his own sins, for (v26) [he] is holy harmless and undefiled pointing here to the suitability of the sacrifice that he made.

A man, even the God-man, must be fit, in the manner that God requires, to serve God in God’s work. Moses was not fit to lead the people into the land (v51) because [he] trespassed against [the LORD] among the children of Israel … and did not hallow him.  Joshua on the other hand had been faithful, and in particular after the reconnaissance of the land, along with Caleb, the son of Jephunnah, had come back with a good report, assured that the LORD would give the land to them despite the apparent strength of the occupants. Joshua was therefore a fit and capable leader of the people for that time.

And so we have this illustration, and pointer, at the end of the life of Moses, the law-giver, that the law only condemns. Something different was needed. And at the end of Moses’s life a Jesus, for that is the Greek name for Joshua, steps in to take the people to their home.

Later the law, contrary to the law, condemned our Lord Jesus to death, not for his sins for he is spotless, but for ours. And it is this Jesus, the new Joshua, who will take his people to their eternal home, as prefigured here in Deuteronomy, and who brought it to actuality when he told the thief (more properly in our contemporary understanding of his crimes a terrorist): Today, you will be with me in paradise, so that the thief would be the first to be taken to the promised land, which beforehand had only been seen in pictures.

With this great picture in mind we turn to a few words in the midst of all that Moses had to say (v35): Their foot shall slip in due time. Jonathan Edwards, preached at least twice on these words, in 1741 in Enfield and Northampton. His sermon, Sinners in the hands of a mighty God, is well worth the read, if you have not already done so, but this evening’s is not that sermon.

We have to ask three questions:

  • Who are they whose feet shall slip?
  • What does this mean to slip?
  • What can be done to prevent slippage?

The NT provides answers to these questions, and in effect commentary on these words though not explicitly quoted, at least five of which are found in those difficult passages in the letter to the Hebrews (2, 3, 6, 10 and 12) the last of which was read to you this evening. You may have wondered at times what the apostle was saying in these passages in Hebrews for at first glance you may think that he is saying we could lose our salvation. You may have heard it said that although the Lord said ‘No-one is able to pluck [my disciples] out of my hand’ that doesn’t mean you cannot jump out yourself.

I want to show you from what Moses had to say to the Hebrews that that is false, bad theology and a complete and utter misunderstanding of these passages in the letter to the Hebrews. We do not have time to consider those passages, nor even other passages in the NT which also have a bearing on this matter, but we may touch upon them, so we shall do this not so much by considering those passages but by grasping in our minds and hearts what Moses said here to the children of Israel.

The song itself

First of all however we must get hold of this Song of Moses, and understand the general flow of the song, and therefore how the words we are to consider fit in, for this song speaks very clearly about men falling away from the calling of God, perhaps in an even clearer way than the apostle did in his letter to the Hebrews.

Its delivery to the people

The song is introduced for us in the previous chapter: Moses spoke in the hearing of all the congregation of Israel the words of this song until they were ended/when they were finished.

All the congregation – I try to imagine this. There were 3-4m people in the camp. It seems impossible that he could speak to them all at the same time. The descriptions provided however in the previous chapter suggest that it is likely that the words were spoken many times over, either directly by Moses to many assemblies throughout the camp, or once to the elders who then repeated the words to their subordinates, and so on, until the whole camp had heard. We must remember that the camp was well organised following the visit some forty years earlier by Jethro, Moses’s father in law.

The division of the song

However it was done, it is the words that were spoken that matter. They are words of warning. They are words similar to Joshua’s words to the people before he died. They are words repeated time and again by the prophets. They are words repeated by Paul in his letter to Rome, and to the Ephesian elders as he returned to Jerusalem, though the words were adapted to the context in which Paul spoke them. And they are words which need to be repeated to us today.

So briefly, we have an overview of the song, which may be divided into three parts, an introduction v1-4, a history v5-42 and a, perhaps surprising, conclusion v43.

Introduction

The first few verses introduce us to the LORD and to the beauty of the LORD. The message is so important that Moses calls on the heavens and the earth to pay attention. By heavens and earth we should understand not the senseless, ignorant creation but all sentient beings, the vast hosts of angelic beings, and men on earth, all who are capable of understanding what Moses had to say. The words are described as a gentle rain or dew – but when we read them perhaps our minds would rather turn to the fierceness of the rain in a storm than dew on the grass. But Moses is right, taken in the right way, these are gentle words of warning, and they come from the God who longs to gather his people together, who loves them with an everlasting love and, who, from their perspective, would give his own life for them.

Then Moses turns us (v3-4) to the attributes of God which will infuse this song with its life: his truth, justice and righteousness, and which will be resolved in the concluding verse.

Middle section

The middle section itself may be divided into two parts, which may themselves be subdivided.

5-18     The first part is a description and assessment of the people and the Lord’s provision for them.

19-42   The second part shows the Lord’s response to the people’s wickedness

The parts are overlapping and we find here, intertwined, descriptions of the problem, of judgement and the graciousness of the LORD towards his people.

This part clearly sets out what the problem is. It is found in the hearts of the people. It is that which will in due time cause their feet to slip.

Conclusion

The conclusion is perhaps surprising for it calls on the Gentiles to rejoice with his people. You will find that reading in the footnote in the pew Bibles (ESV). They are not to rejoice over them, nor are they to rejoice for them, but with them. The LORD has something in mind for the Gentiles which they shall share with his people, Israel.

Let me say that there is a small problem here. The Hebrew text, the Dead Sea scrolls and the Septuagint (LXX – the Greek translation of a Hebrew text which is older than the Hebrew text preserved for us by the Jews) are slightly different, though not irreconcilably:

Hebrew: Rejoice, Gentiles, his people
Dead Sea scrolls: Rejoice with him, O heavens,
            Bow down to/Worship him all the angels of God
Septuagint: Rejoice with him, O heavens,
            Bow down to/Worship him all the angels of God
            Rejoice, Gentiles, with his people
            Be strengthened in him all the sons of God

The Hebrew has one line. The Dead Sea scrolls have two different lines. And the LXX has all three lines plus one extra perhaps to complete the Hebrew parallelism.

I am not concerned with the words Worship him all the angels of God, different considerations apply to those, which though not in the Hebrew are attested in the NT, but nor indeed with Rejoice with him. O heavens as it is in the ESV, but rather with the omission of, or the relegation to a foot note of, Rejoice, O Gentiles, with his people.

This is not the place for textual criticism, nor is the speaker the man to do it, but I am disappointed that the pew version (the ESV) had ignored the witness of the Hebrew text and the LXX and used only the Dead Sea scrolls version in the main text, and especially so as Paul quotes this part of the verse in Romans 15:10 exactly as the LXX have it Rejoice, O Gentiles, with his people. However, at least this reading is in the footnote!

I prefer the Hebrew reading, which you will find in the footnote: Rejoice, Gentiles, with his people not for reasons of textual criticism but for theological reasons. This reading fits with the whole plan of salvation that the Lord had devised in which Israel would play an important part, secondly it flows naturally out of the promises made to Abraham on which the benefits that Israel had received and were to receive depended, for by them blessing was intended to come to the Gentiles, of which we also read in this song. The necessary outcome of this is that the Gentiles shall rejoice with his people.

So, stepping back then, there is a reference here back to the promise made to Abraham, that in his seed all the nations of the earth shall be blest (Gen 12:3). Israel was a special people, but only as a type of the people that God would call together out of all the nations to be, as Peter reminds us, a chosen people, a kingdom of priests, a holy nation and his special people (1 Pet 2:9). Paul speaks of the same in Romans – to the Jew first and also to the Greek/Gentile/Barbarian, whether he speaks of judgement or of salvation. We then, who are Gentiles, should remember this, that when we rejoice in the Lord, it is together with, and not apart from, the Jew.

The conclusion also shows us how the LORD will deal with the problem. It is not the blood of bulls offered by the Aaronic priesthood that shall absolve the people, but the LORD himself who shall provide an atonement for the land, his people – both Jew and Greek – again a reference back to Abraham’s reply to Isaac: God shall himself provide the lamb for the burnt offering (Gen 22:8).

With these things in mind we can turn to the middle section. And I apologise that we cannot deal with this exhaustively, nor even comprehensively, it would take far more time than we have available. If as a result you think I have misrepresented something, please do corner me later.

The middle section

The middle section consists of two parts, which may be further divided into seven. The divisions I have used are not strict, they overlap, and you may find different ways in which to organise them.

5-18     The first part is a description and assessment of the people and the Lord’s provision for them.

19-42   The second part shows the Lord’s response to the people’s wickedness

The description

5-6       A description of the people – their wickedness

It is put very simply: they are corrupt or as some say they have corrupted themselves. And as we would say, they bite the hand of the one who feeds them. They are ungrateful to their own Father, the God who brought them out of Egypt.

7-12     A description of the Lord’s care for them, his provision, his keeping

Moses then reminds the people something of their recent history. Ask your elders, he says, they will tell you how good the LORD has been to you whilst here in the wilderness. Then stepping back further he speaks of the Lord separating the peoples, probably here referring to the separation of the nations after the judgement at the tower of Babel. In this separation the cursed children of Canaan were given the land into which the Israelites were about to go. Their boundaries had been set, defining the boundaries of the Promised Land. The long awaited judgement was about to fall on them at the hand of the Israelites for Jacob is the place of his inheritance.

Then we are told something about the deliverance of the people out of Egypt, the land of bondage, here described as a desert land, a howling wilderness, for this is how it seemed to them when they raised their voices and their cries were heard in heaven. It was the Lord alone who had led them out and as it were carried them on eagle’s wings.

13-14   A description of their enjoyment his goodness, having tasted they fell away

The enjoyment of the riches of the Lord’s provision is described in terms of the blessings of rich and plentiful food: curds, milk, the fat of lambs, the best of breeds, choice wheat and the finest wines. This blessing however was abused and Jeshurun grew fat, not healthily.

15-18   A description of turning away to false gods, despite all of this they turned aside to false gods and provoked the Lord to anger

And in his fatness, he forgot that all of these good things came from the LORD, and he turned to false gods, to demons, and not even to the gods their fathers served before the Lord called them, but to novelty gods, inventing their own.

Such is the ignorance of men’s hearts, that they cannot be content with one false god, they must have more. Look at the pantheon of India, and how it has grown from a handful to the millions of today. Or to Athens, where the people were so concerned that they appeased all of the gods that they included an altar to the unknown god, just in case. And this, our own, land is falling back into such ignorance. You may have seen only this week that special, so they were described, prayers were said by animistic elders from Brazil before certain artefacts, presently held at Kew Gardens, from the Amazon were handled. This ignorance even went so far as requiring you to paint yourself in a very particular way before you even looked at some of them lest some dreadful fate befall you. What ignorance! Medusa is once again alive and well in London. But should we be surprised? In the light of this song of Moses is it not but what we can expect? Men who turn from the true God are quite adept at inventing their own.

Drawing out from the first section

In brief what this shows us, and it is extraordinary, that Israel to whom all of the promises had been given, despite their apparent benefits, rejected the Lord who provided them. If there were ever a health, wealth and prosperity gospel, it was this for they were going into a land flowing with milk and honey. They had received the promise that none of the diseases that had afflicted the Egyptians (Dt 7:15) would fall upon them. Later in the days of Solomon even silver was accounted as of little worth (1 Kings 10:21). Not only were they going into such a land, they had already tasted its benefits (v13-14) and had grown fat on it (v15). And in their fatness they abandoned the LORD.

But, as we shall see, God had something better in mind. We find that the promises are all about Christ. They are all fulfilled in him (2 Cor 1:20), and we find that Moses had instituted not a ministry of life (2 Cor 3) but of death for the law could only bring condemnation.

Christ institutes better things than Moses, for in him is life. In him we are not taken out of Egypt into a promised land in this world, in the same way that Noah was taken out of the old world into the present world and as they were taken into Canaan to take their sins with them. As if to reinforce this later these words would be heard. Jesus/Joshua asked this as he was about to depart from them: Choose you this day whom you will serve, will you serve the gods of your fathers [from beyond the Euphrates] or the gods of the land [into which you have been brought]? They were in the Promised Land, and would take all of it, but they had brought their sin with them. That sin would remain to corrupt the people, and ultimately to corrupt the land in which they lived so that it would not yield its fruit to them.

So we see that the benefits that Israel received were temporal not eternal. That is not to say they were small benefits, the benefits were great and glorious. Paul (Rom 3:1) asks the question: What advantage has the Jew? And answers in the affirmative, that there is much advantage in every way for the oracles of God had been committed to them and the LORD had promised that he would dwell among them if they were faithful to him.

But God’s judgement on them was that they had corrupted themselves (v5). Men are rebels against God. In God’s common grace he provides for all men: the sun rises and sets, the rains fall, the seed is planted, the Lord provides the harvest. Paul speaks with the Athenians of the general goodness of God to men as grounds for seeking, and knowing, the true God (Acts 17:24ff, v27). If we have no excuse in the face of his general goodness, how little excuse when he shows his special grace and care as he did to Israel in bringing them out of Egypt and into the Promised Land. But even in the face of his special grace men are rebels. We continue to corrupt ourselves.

In this world nothing could have been better than to have lived in a faithful Israel in the Promised Land, but the health, wealth and prosperity gospel failed. The law failed. It could not change the hearts of men.

The Lord’s response

So we turn to the Lord’s response.

19-22   A description of the Lord’s response, the provocation to jealousy by the Gentiles and how he shall extend his grace towards them – Paul speaks of this in Romans (10:19 and 11: 11).

The chasing after false gods provoked the Lord to jealousy and ultimately to reject the people. He spurned them (v19). He hid his face from them. Time and again we see this cycle in the time of the judges. The people go after the false gods. The Lord hides his face. The people of the land oppress them. They cry out to the Lord and he delivers them, only for them to return to the false gods.

They were not faithful, v16 They provoked him to jealousy by serving false gods. God was right to judge them. And in turn God provokes them to jealousy by showing greater grace to those who are not one people (v21) but many, that is to say to the Gentiles.

But even that was not enough to prevent the falling away, as we know looking from our day. Even when the Lord brings judgement upon them and extends his special grace to the Gentiles – to [most of] us – to provoke Israel to jealousy, Israel continues to harden her heart. Indeed the extension of grace to the Gentiles, seems to further the opposition of the Jews to the work of God. It did during the Lord’s ministry; it did during the lives of the apostles; and it continued to this day. But God will not give them up. Has God given up on Israel? Paul asked and answered in the negative. Of course not he replied for he himself was a Jew.

The reason why they are not given up is found in the next verses where the Lord’s judgement is described.

23-35   A description of the judgement that shall fall

These verses describe the judgements. They are natural disasters, pestilence, hunger, destruction, and at the hand of the wild animals. They are also wars; the sword shall devour them. There shall be no distinction of person, whether old, or young, man or woman. A thousand shall be put to flight by one. Surely under the judgement of God every heart is put to fright. No-one has safety.

And how is this possible? How was it possible that one man can put 1000 to flight? The Lord tells us that it was because he had sold them to their enemies. It was he who surrendered them (v30).

Then we see that though the judgement on Israel comes at the hands of their enemies, the enemies are no better than Israel. The LORD is the Rock of Israel (v31), and he is a faithful, righteous God. But their rock is like Sodom and Gomorrah, their grapes are grapes of gall, their wine is the poison of serpents and the venom of cobras. And so a judgement is laid up in store for them (v34). 

Note that this judgement is sealed up, and does it seem strange? It is sealed up with his treasures. Doesn’t this tell us that judgement is a precious thing? It is a not an ordinary work of God. It is not to be kept on display at all times, though the evidence of it is always present – even the rainbow in the sky reminds us of that – the Lord keeps judgement in his storehouse. He holds back his hand. When a man asks, why does God not deal with the wicked? Perhaps we should point out that if God dealt with the wicked in the way that that man had in mind, all of us would be snuffed out in an instant. But the judgements of God are far wiser than that. And he holds back his hand.

Vengeance belongs to the LORD (v35). This means that calamity shall fall on all who will not be obedient to him. Whether they ignore his common grace to all men or whether they ignore his special grace to his people, their foot shall slip in due time. One day the seal shall be broken; the store-house shall be opened; and the judgement that has been stored up shall be poured out.

I suggested that the judgements of God are wiser than man’s idea of judgement. In the midst of this description of the terrible judgement we find this strange phrase: had I not feared the provocation [or wrath] of the enemy (v27). If God had not feared the enemy he says, he would have destroyed his people from the face of the earth (v26 paraphrased). But why would God have reason to fear his enemy? Perhaps we misunderstand fear here to be fear as we would feel it. Let us consider the reason the Lord gives as to why he will not give up on them, and try to understand. He said for fear of men he will not destroy. What does he mean?

He says in v19 he spurned them, but there is a limit to his spurning. The Lord has made promises and the glory of his name is dependent upon the keeping of those promises. He will not dash them to pieces (v26) or erase their memory from among men – unlike Nineveh whose name when Alexander came across its ruins had been forgotten by those who still lived in the land.

Then, is this a reference back to Moses contention with the LORD when he said Stand aside, and I shall destroy the people? And Moses replied, Not so! For these are your people whom you brought out of Egypt. What will the nations say if you destroy them? (Ex. 32 I have condensed the words more than Moses did). Moses was bold because he was mindful of the promises that the Lord had made, and he knew that the LORD will honour his own name and therefore keep his promises to men.

But then again in considering this, think carefully that the honour of his name is independent of us or of anything he has made. He must keep his promises for they are also made to himself. The promises were in the first place to the Son, all of the other promises flow from this one. Ask of me, and I shall give you the nations as an inheritance (Psalm 2:8). Even if God were to erase everything he has made, so that nothing that had been made remained, this promise must stand for it was made by the Father to the Son, the Son fulfilled all of the conditions attached to that promise and so (Rom 3:25) [he] was set forth as the propitiation for sin. The promise must be kept or God is not God. The nations have been given to the Son, and the Son must therefore bring them to glory. God cannot cut them to pieces, nor can he wipe them out of existence or God is not God. What confidence we may have then in him. In the first instance he will save his people and bring them to glory because he is faithful to himself. As Paul says  to Timothy (2 2:13): If we are faithless, he remains faithful for he cannot deny himself.

Likewise, when he judges his people he will not allow men to say that it is the hand of man that has given them success. When Nebuchadnezzar, who had executed the Lord’s judgement on Judah, attributed the glory of Babylon to his own work, God humbled him to eat grass like the beasts of the field. Men will not take to themselves the glory of a victory over Israel.

And again, it may have been the Romans who nailed the Lord to the cross, but the Lord by Isaiah declared beforehand that this was the work of God (Is 53:4,10), and Peter also afterwards (Acts 2:23) that this was the carefully planned intention of God. The work of God in judgement is not to be overlooked by men.

Which brings us to the final part of the middle section. where the LORD says here: Now see that I, even I, am he, and there is no God besides me (v39) I kill and I make alive, I would and I heal,. Nor is there any who can deliver from my hand.

36-42   A description of the mercy that he will show

In v36 suddenly there is a change of tone. The Lord had pronounced judgement on his people at the hands of his enemies and also judgement on his enemies, and here we have the words: The LORD will judge, in the sense as it is in the ESV of vindicate, his people and have compassion on his servants.

Suddenly judgement is apparently turned on its head. This is not the judgement the man in the street means. This is a different judgement. They hated Jesus because he associated with tax collectors and sinners. The thief was condemned by a Roman court to crucifixion, but a higher court washed him and absolved him as he hung there and he was admitted to Paradise that same day.

But see the circumstances of this. It is in their extremity that the Lord reaches out to them; when their strength has gone. When his people reach the end of their strength, when they understand that by their own works they cannot please him or serve him, then he steps in to save. And so he shows this in history for in the fullness of time Christ entered this world to make atonement for his people and the land. Even when we, and they, were his enemies he stepped in to save us.

The Lord then declared that it is he who does all of these things. He kills. He makes alive. He wounds. He heals. There is no escape. And he leaves us in these words with no doubt that he is the judge. There is no other.

So then, Their foot shall slip in due time. I said that there were three things we had to ask,

  • Who are they whose feet shall slip?
  • What does this mean to slip?
  • What can be done to prevent slippage?

How do we answer these questions? So what is the cause of the slippage? What are the consequences? How can it be prevented?

Who are they? They are all men. No-one is excepted from this; the Hebrew who refuses the special grace of God; the Gentile who refuses the common grace. Both are equally enemies of God. They forsake him and turn to idols and fall under his righteous judgements, which are stored up in his treasury to be revealed in due time.

What does it mean to slip?

It means whatever the outward appearances are, and the Hebrews knew far more of the blessings of God than any other nation. How easy would have been to look at them, see how favoured they were by God and then to think that they were also pleasing to him. But no, their hearts were as ready to slip away from the outward obedience to God as the hearts of the Gentiles who made no pretence of obedience.

It means then to forget the true God. It may not mean falling into open immorality, it could mean this, but at heart it is idolatry. It is a placing of other things in our lives where God should be. We make gods for ourselves and we serve them.

What then can be done to prevent this falling away? The Lord shows in this song the inadequacy of a temporal salvation. The law cannot work, it merely condemns. The gospel of health, wealth and prosperity cannot work, it merely inflames our desires for more of this world’s good things. These things do not change the hearts of men. Something else, something different, is required in order that the something better can come. It is only at the end of the song that that is revealed to us: [The LORD] will provide atonement for his land and his people. Paul echoes the inclusion of the land in this salvation when he also says: The whole creates groans with eager expectation waiting for the revealing of the sons of God (Rom 8:23 para). The salvation of his people is intrinsically bound up with the renewal of the land and hence, by inference, of the whole creation. It is only when the Lord provides atonement for his people that we shall be brought back from the brink.

It is when we are without strength, whilst we are his enemies, whilst we are dead in our sins that he comes to show mercy to us. To those who think they are alive he says I kill, but to those who are dead and without strength he says I make alive.

Conclusion

We have seen that the law was totally incapable of helping the people. The law merely condemned. Indeed it provoked sin, and showed sin up to be what it is. Something better was required, which is here only hinted at in the final verse, but the source of which is clearly shown throughout the song, in the love, compassion and mercy of the God who desires that all should be saved and come to him through faith in the sacrifice that he would provide, Jesus Christ, so that men are left without excuse. And the better solution, the only solution, was revealed in him, when he steps in and provides atonement for the people: as Paul describes it for us in Romans (Romans 3:21-31):

Now then without the law the righteousness of God is revealed, which was spoken about by the law and the prophets (including here), a righteousness of God through belief in Jesus Christ for all who are believing, for there is no separation/distinction, in the same way as all have sinned and mangled the glory of God, they will be declared righteous as a gift by his grace through the salvation in Jesus Christ, whom God openly set forth as a pleasing sacrifice through belief in his own blood to make known/show his own righteousness in [having suffered] the sins of former times in the patience of God, in order to show his righteousness in the present time, in order to show that he is both righteous/just and the declarer of righteousness/justifier of those out of/by reason of faith of/in Jesus.

Where then is boasting? It is locked out. Through the doing of the law? Through works? No, but by the law of belief. We reason in this way, a man is declared righteous through faith without the works of the law. Is God of the Jews only? Not also of the (heathen) nations? Yes, also of the heathen. Otherwise, [not only] one God, who declares righteous the circumcised out of belief and the uncircumcised through belief?

Do we make nothing the law through faith? Not at all! But we establish [firmly, rightly and securely] the law.

And what of us? Will our foot slip in due time? We should each ask ourselves the question.

As Moses said to the people (v46-7): Set your hearts on all the words which I testify among you today, which you shall command your children to be careful to observe – all the words of this law. For it is not a futile thing for you, because it is your life, and by this word you shall prolong your days in the land which you cross over the Jordan to possess.

And, should our foot slip, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous, so let us confess our sin and know that for fear of the enemy God will not destroy us, for he cannot deny himself.

Praise!

199      The God of Abraham praise            578 We come before our fathers’ God

579      Thy hand O God hath guided…

773      A debtor to mercy alone

The terrors of law and of God with me shall have nothing to do…

How happy but no more secure….

774      A sovereign protector

Romans 3:21-31

Hebrews 12

25        See that you do not refuse him who speaks. For if they did not escape who refused him who spoke on earth, much more shall we not escape if we turn away from him who speaks from heaven, 26 whose voice then shook the earth; but now he has promised, saying, “Yet once more I shake not only the earth, but also heaven.” 27 Now this, “Yet once more,” indicates the removal of those things that are being shaken, as of things that are made, that the things which cannot be shaken may remain.

28        Therefore, since we are receiving a kingdom which cannot be shaken, let us have grace, by which we may serve God acceptably with reverence and godly fear. 29 For our God is a consuming fire.

Deuteronomy 32

31:30   The Moses spoke in the hearing of all the congregation of Israel the words of this song until they were ended:

The Song of Moses

32:1     “Give ear, O heavens, and I will speak; and hear, O earth, the words of my mouth.

2          Let my teaching drop as the rain, my speech distil as the dew, as raindrops on the tender herb, and as showers on the grass.

3          For I proclaim the name of the Lord: Ascribe greatness to our God.

4          He is the Rock, his work is perfect; for all his ways are justice, a God of truth and without injustice; righteous and upright is he.

5          “They have corrupted themselves; they are not his children, because of their blemish: a perverse and crooked generation.

6          Do you thus deal with the Lord, O foolish and unwise people? Is he not your Father, who bought you? Has he not made you and established you?

7          “Remember the days of old, consider the years of many generations. Ask your father, and he will show you; your elders, and they will tell you:

8          When the Most High divided their inheritance to the nations, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the boundaries of the peoples according to the number of the children of Israel.

9          For the Lord’s portion is his people; Jacob is the place of his inheritance.

10        “He found him in a desert land and in the wasteland, a howling wilderness; he encircled him, he instructed him, he kept him as the apple of his eye.

11        As an eagle stirs up its nest, hovers over its young, spreading out its wings, taking them up, carrying them on its wings,

12        so the Lord alone led him, and there was no foreign god with him.

13        “He made him ride in the heights of the earth, that he might eat the produce of the fields; he made him draw honey from the rock, and oil from the flinty rock;

14        Curds from the cattle, and milk of the flock, with fat of lambs; and rams of the breed of Bashan, and goats, with the choicest wheat; and you drank wine, the blood of the grapes.

15        “But Jeshurun grew fat and kicked; you grew fat, you grew thick, you are covered with fat [obese]! Then he forsook God who made him, and scornfully esteemed the Rock of his salvation.

16        They provoked him to jealousy with foreign gods; with abominations they provoked him to anger.

17        They sacrificed to demons, not to God, to gods they did not know, to new gods, new arrivals that your fathers did not fear.

18        Of the Rock who begot you, you are unmindful, and have forgotten the God who fathered you.

19        “And when the Lord saw it, he spurned them, because of the provocation of his sons and his daughters.

20        And he said: ‘I will hide my face from them, I will see what their end will be, for they are a perverse generation, children in whom is no faith.

21        They have provoked me to jealousy by what is not God; they have moved me to anger by their foolish idols. But I will provoke them to jealousy by those who are not a nation; I will move them to anger by a foolish nation.

22        For a fire is kindled in my anger, and shall burn to the lowest hell; it shall consume the earth with her increase, and set on fire the foundations of the mountains.

23        ‘I will heap disasters on them; I will spend my arrows on them.

24        They shall be wasted with hunger, devoured by pestilence and bitter destruction; I will also send against them the teeth of beasts, with the poison of serpents of the dust.

25        The sword shall destroy outside; there shall be terror within for the young man and virgin, the nursing child with the man of grey hairs.

26        I would have said, “I will dash them in pieces, I will make the memory of them to cease from among men,”

27        Had I not feared the wrath of the enemy, lest their adversaries should misunderstand, lest they should say, “Our hand is high; and it is not the Lord who has done all this.” ’

28        “For they are a nation void of counsel, nor is there any understanding in them.

29        Oh, that they were wise, that they understood this, that they would consider their latter end!

30        How could one chase a thousand, and two put ten thousand to flight, unless their Rock had sold them, and the Lord had surrendered them?

31        For their rock is not like our Rock, even our enemies themselves being judges.

32        For their vine is of the vine of Sodom and of the fields of Gomorrah; their grapes are grapes of gall, their clusters are bitter.

33        Their wine is the poison of serpents, and the cruel venom of cobras.

34        ‘Is this not laid up in store with me, sealed up among my treasures?

35        Vengeance is mine, and recompense; their foot shall slip in due time; for the day of their calamity is at hand, and the things to come hasten upon them.’

36        “For the Lord will judge his people and have compassion on his servants, when he sees that their power is gone, and there is no one remaining, bond or free.

37        He will say: ‘Where are their gods, the rock in which they sought refuge?

38        Who ate the fat of their sacrifices, and drank the wine of their drink offering? Let them rise and help you, and be your refuge.

39        ‘Now see that I, even I, am he, and there is no God besides me; I kill and I make alive; I wound and I heal; nor is there any who can deliver from my hand.

40        For I raise my hand to heaven, and say, “As I live forever,

41        If I whet my glittering sword, and my hand takes hold on judgment, I will render vengeance to my enemies, and repay those who hate me.

42        I will make my arrows drunk with blood, and my sword shall devour flesh, with the blood of the slain and the captives from the heads of the leaders of the enemy.” ’

43        “Rejoice, O Gentiles, with his people; [let all the angels of God worship him – Psalm 97:7, Heb 1:6 and Dead Sea scrolls] for he will avenge the blood of his servants, and render vengeance to his adversaries; he will provide atonement [cleanse] for his land and his people.”

44        So Moses came with Joshua the son of Nun and spoke all the words of this song in the hearing of the people. 45 Moses finished speaking all these words to all Israel, 46 and he said to them: “Set your hearts on all the words which I testify among you today, which you shall command your children to be careful to observe – all the words of this law. 47 For it is not a futile thing for you, because it is your life, and by this word you shall prolong your days in the land which you cross over the Jordan to possess.”

48        Then the Lord spoke to Moses that very same day, saying: 49 “Go up this mountain of the Abarim, Mount Nebo, which is in the land of Moab, across from Jericho; view the land of Canaan, which I give to the children of Israel as a possession; 50 and die on the mountain which you ascend, and be gathered to your people, just as Aaron your brother died on Mount Hor and was gathered to his people; 51 because you trespassed against me among the children of Israel at the waters of Meribah Kadesh, in the Wilderness of Zin, because you did not hallow me in the midst of the children of Israel. 52 Yet you shall see the land before you, though you shall not go there, into the land which I am giving to the children of Israel.”

Fake News

Fake news is nothing if not new

Something you might need to relieve it.

I have not seen it, why would I want to? When a unique opportunity presents itself, we should not play with trifles. The BBC article refers to a film clip which has apparently been doctored, a term which is strangely used, but regardless:

Fake news

Goebbels was incensed by the Lambeth Valk; would YouTube or Facebook have banned it in the face of dogged (careful with that word) complaints by the elected government of our Saxon cousins? Should YouTube even now ban it? It is clearly a ‘deep fakes’ video that has been edited, using then readily available technology, to realistically portray something very different. Charles Ridley should have referred to his employer as the British Ministry of Misinformation. The article tries to say that context matters ‘Simple matters of context make those arguments fall away’ but does it really?

Exeter University sacked an employee because he used words similar to the ones that answered my opening question on the grounds that this was a quotation from Rommel. Context matters. Rommel echoed these thoughts in the desert of northern Africa. Exeter University used them in promotional material. Whether the words were true or not did not seem to come into play. Neither did the context matter, the same words said in the heat of battle convey a different urgency than when read in the cool context of potential students’ studies. The irony of the Exeter situation is deepened of course in that Rommel was not actually quoted. What we read are the words of a translator not Rommel’s words. I do not dispute that the translation is accurate merely point out that the words were not Rommel’s. Perhaps the editor of the material would have done better, and been safer, to have produced his own translation and left it unattributed.

Secondly, there are other areas where mockery may be seen to be prejudicial to what would otherwise be good. There is much debate today about the mmGm vaccine. The smallpox vaccine was in for far worse treatement when it was introduced over two hundred years ago. Given what we could do eighty years ago, James Gillray may have marvelled at what he could have produced today in place of what we would now see as an amusing caricature of the vaccine based on cowpox. Would we permit such a video to reside in the pages of YouTube or FaceBook? But we do, except it is to be found on NetFlix where it is called family entertainment or perhaps better horror movies.

We must admit that fake news can be dangerous. It was, with hindsight an inopportune time, but perhaps some of you actually heard the 1938 announcement about the invasion from Mars, or at least know someone who did. What were the consequences of that piece of ‘fake’ information? More seriously, and I doubt that any of us could claim to know an eyewitness to another event but eyewitnessed it was, a group of individuals met Joshua (Joshua 9) about 3200 years ago with fake news, the consequences of which would be felt for many hundreds of years and be very severe for Israel. The Gibeonites were permitted to remain in Canaan. Fake news has been around for a long time, it is not new, just presented in different ways.

Fake news can be both dangerous and amusing. What are the warning words of the slapstick comedy? Don’t try this at home, it has been staged. In the words of another man who must not be quoted: Sie müssen sich hüten.

Would that we had the man of the stature and skill of Gillray to doctor the first mentioned video, perhaps then it would be worth watching.

The Cow Pock. James Gillray


Crushing into a small, crowded room out of a small pox infested London, the Cockneys submitting themselves to the quacks, yielding to the bovine infusion, awaited the inevitable apocalyptic extrusions.

The second thief

Did you see what is going on in China?

Coco thought he would offer two different perspectives on the day which we call Good Friday. Please grant him an indulgence for this first one. The second perspective has been inspired by events at the focus of the Sinospheric regions. He shall come to that shortly.

They knew it was not just to be a normal day, but a mood of gloom had spread over the hosts of angels which was, if it could be, even deeper than the gloom which rested upon the earth1. They thought it would never end. Gabriel was in his office, he really did not know what to do. They saw what was going on, but did not understand it at all. They knew it was very serious, they had heard someone say in Egypt2: the gods must be very angry about something. He looked at the throne. He could not approach it, God was clearly angry, very angry. Gabriel had never seen this sort of anger before.

Just a twenty four hours earlier they had had instructions to prepare and twelve thousand angels had spent several hours polishing their armour and sharpening their swords, for it was not known whether they would be called upon or not3. But the call to arms did not come. What had happened? One of their number had been sent to a garden, but had not returned with a message to send more4. They were in limbo (not that there is a limbo of course, but you understand Coco’s meaning).

They knew of course what was happening on earth. They had seen it before the thick darkness fell. Three men had been taken to a hill to be crucified, and one of them was their lord, the other two were thieves. Why had they not been sent to rescue him? They had not been short in their preparation. But now the darkness had fallen, they could not see through it, this was the kind of darkness that they had never seen before. Even though they knew that when light shines in the darkness the darkness cannot overcome it5, this darkness seemed to be even darker than that and had all the appearance of being able to prevail.

Just when Gabriel thought it could not get any worse, a large shipment of cloth arrived. Gabriel was not unused to this, red, blue and gold cloth6 were not uncommon as they were used for the priestly garments, but this was different. It was fine white linen. Gabriel could not think of a use for it (He should have remembered what one of his co-workers had done when Joshua appeared before the throne7). Where was he going to store it? He had no idea, and even if he did none of the others had at that time any motivation to be able to do anything. Then a note came giving instructions on what to do with it. They were to make garments out of it, and quickly as one set would be needed within the next hour.

Gabriel was almost at his wits end. How could he do this? No-one had a heart to work, and he had no pattern to use, and even if he did, he did not know what size would be required. Just as he was pondering this, there was a knock on his office door and an angel burst in.

Gabriel,” he said, “something big is happening. There is an enormous commotion over by the gate, and we cannot control it. The gates, you know they are normally quite sedentary, but they are moving, not only that they are lifting up the doors. Another group of angels is singing8 to them: ‘Lift up your heads, O you gates! Be lifted up you everlasting doors.’ What was going on? Can you tell us?

Then Gabriel remembered the words of David in Psalm 249, and asked: “Has the darkness gone?” The message quickly went out to the others, they all looked. “Yes!” they shouted back, “The darkness on the earth has gone.” “Then we had better get ready quickly, the King is coming back. David spoke about it9: ‘Lift up your heads, O you gates, be lifted up you everlasting doors and the King of Glory shall come in.’ Quickly, everyone go to your posts! We must welcome our lord, he is coming home.” Then another angel shouted out: “I heard him cry out: ‘It is finished10, just before the darkness went.”

Gabriel went to the gates, they had now stopped moving. They were ready, they had lifted up their heads and lifted up the doors, and were waiting.

Then a man appeared, it was one of the two thieves who had been crucified that day. ‘What is he doing here?11‘ they thought. He was filthy, he looked as if he had been running around the street all night and was very much the worse for wear, he needed a good wash and new clothes. They were aghast. An angel stepped forward to bar the way12 of the man. The thief gave him a slip of paper, which was passed to another angel to give to Gabriel. It simply said, ‘Put clean clothes of fine linen on him.’ Gabriel then remembered what the prophet Zechariah had said13 and understood why the fine white linen had arrived. In the earlier commotion he had forgotten about the linen and the instructions, and was about to be embarrassed by the lack of a fine linen tunic, when another angel stepped forward and placed one in his hands. One of the deputies had seen the instructions which Gabriel had left behind and several of the angels had already started work. This was the first item, which had only been sent over as a sample for approval. Gabriel went over to the thief and placed the fine linen tunic on him, at which point the old clothes and all of the filth was washed away.

A second man then walked through the gates, he too was bruised, battered, covered in his own blood, with fresh wounds in his hands, feet and side14, but he was glorious in appearance15. The angels fell on their faces and worshipped him as he walked over to the former thief, and said to him: “I told you, today! Come, let me show you to your room and then let us go to the Father16, 17 & 18. Then I must leave you, for I have more work to do.

Coco Spring 2019

Of course this is an entirely fantastic (lit.) story, but Coco hopes to have given you enough references to see it is not entirely implausible. Perhaps the biggest error here is that Coco has attributed human limitations to the angels, but as Coco does not know any angels yet, he does not know what the limitations are that should be placed upon them, though we can see some of them in God’s word, so he hopes you will be indulgent towards him.

The real point here is that two men were crucified with Jesus19. One of them said to the other one: “We deserve to be here, but [Jesus] does not.” Then he bowed the knee (not that when you are nailed to a cross you can do that literally, but he did so in the way that matters – he submitted his heart and mind to the Lord) to Jesus and said: “Lord, remember me, when you come into your kingdom.” Jesus replied: “Today, you will be with me in paradise.”

The other thief continued to blaspheme and was lost.

There are only two possible endings, a good one and a bad one. One thief knew that Jesus was the Christ, but did nothing with it. The other thief appeared to know but a little about Jesus, but he took what he did know and went to Jesus with it. Take what you know about him to him, and ask him to show you what you do not know, and get to know him as Saviour and Lord.

Please bear with me. There have been many cæsars who have not cared for the king of kings. It was on a day like today that the representative of one such cæsar asked a man: ‘Are you a king then?‘ Only to be told that though he was a king, his kingdom is not of this world. And so, we may understand, that if his kingdom is not of this world then it is no threat to the kings of this world. Indeed, where his subjects live in another kingdom they bring great benefit to that kingdom. ‘What am I to do with these Christians?‘ Pliny wrote to Cæsar20, ‘They don’t do any harm, indeed they do good to everyone in the city‘ (I paraphrase Pliny). Now you must remember that these cæsars were originally a bit like the chairman of the senate, it took a little while for them to attain a godlike status in the empire.

But the kings of the earth cannot bear to think that they have a rival. The meetings of the subjects of the king of kings are treated as politically subversive, seeking to overturn the established social order, without actually considering that the king himself taught that his subjects are like the yeast which fills the whole of the dough and makes the bread bread21. In practice they were to be subject to the earthly kings22 & 23 and indeed to pray for them24.

So, these cæsars required men to come into line. They demanded from men what was not fitting or proper either for men to give to them or for men to receive. They wanted to be worshipped as gods themselves. All you had to do was say ‘Cæsar is lord‘ and burn a little incense. This has continued to this day. It is still within living memory that one king gave up his claim to divinity, but this view that cæsars have of themselves seems to have made a resurgence in other places.

This resurgence however has made for some interesting apposition. If anyone was going to report on this it had to be an Australian source25, who would get there first after the original post.

In the photograph we see a picture of a cross on a hill flanked by the photographs of two gentlemen the heads and shoulders of whom are placed, perhaps auspiciously, at the same level as the head and shoulders of the one who would have been on the empty cross. It is strangely reminiscent of another occasion when an empty cross (I presume that because Jesus was already dead, he was taken down before the two thieves were taken down) was flanked by two other men: ὅπου αὐτὸν ἐσταύρωσαν, καὶ μετ᾿ αὐτοῦ ἄλλους δύο ἐντεῦθεν καὶ ἐντεῦθεν, μέσον δὲ τὸν Ἰησοῦν26. For those who like Coco cannot read Greek this is broadly understood to read: In that place him they crucified, and with him others two side and side, in the middle Jesus. We read that both of these two men mocked and blasphemed Jesus, as did most of the crowd who were gathered there to watch27, but as time went on28 one of the thieves saw something that the other did not. As the first railed at Jesus, saying: “Are you not the Christ? Save yourself and us!” the second replied to him: “Don’t you fear God, since you are under the same condemnation? We are getting what we deserve for what we did, but this man has done nothing wrong.” Then this second one turned to Jesus and said to him: “Lord, remember me, when you come into your kingdom.”

One of the two men had suggested that revolution does not come in quietly like a well-beloved, courteous and welcome friend, but it is troublesome and harsh. The other seems to show the same sort of concern that the recipient of Pliny’s letter showed. He did not want any subversion of the current social order, and people who thought in a different way were perceived to be such a threat. It is strange that the cæsars of this world are all pretty much the same. Can they not learn from history? The history of the Roman Cæsars shows that they cannot overcome the kingdom which is not of this world. Eventually one of their number joined that kingdom and the persecutions ceased. Coco shall make no further comment here on the consequences of that capitulation.

Let us come back to the present, do you remember the promise Jesus made to the second thief? ‘I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in Paradise.’ he said.

Only one of the men flanking the cross of Jesus joined the kingdom which is not of this world. Only one of the thieves entered Paradise. Only one of the men flanking the empty cross in our picture is alive today. Only one of them can join the kingdom. Only one can enter Paradise. Will he do so?

Therefore I urge first of all that that supplications, prayers, intercessions and giving of thanks be made…for kings and all who are in authority29… Paul, a servant of the king in his first letter to Timothy.


Matthew 27:45 From noon until three, darkness came over all the land.
2 Someone spoke in Egypt and here: PhlegonThallus, and others
Matthew 26:53 Do you think that I cannot call on my Father, and that he would send me more than twelve legions of angels right now?
Luke 22:43 Then an angel from heaven appeared to [Jesus] and strengthened him.
John 1:5 The light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not [overcome] it.
Exodus 39:1-5 From the blue, purple, and scarlet yarn they made woven garments for serving in the sanctuary; they made holy garments that were for Aaron, just as the Lord had commanded Moses. He made the ephod of gold, blue, purple, scarlet, and fine twisted linen. They hammered the gold into thin sheets and cut it into narrow strips to weave them into the blue, purple, and scarlet yarn, and into the fine linen, the work of an artistic designer. They made shoulder pieces for it, attached to two of its corners, so it could be joined together. The artistically woven waistband of the ephod that was on it was like it, of one piece with it, of gold, blue, purple, and scarlet yarn and fine twisted linen, just as the Lord had commanded Moses.
Zechariah 3:5 So they put a clean turban on [Joshua’s] head and clothed him, while the angel of the Lord stood nearby.
Psalm 24:7 Look up, you gates! Rise up, you eternal doors!
Psalm 24:7-10 Look up, you gates! Rise up, you eternal doors! Then the majestic king will enter! Who is this majestic king? The Lord who is strong and mighty! The Lord who is mighty in battle! Look up, you gates! Rise up, you eternal doors! Then the majestic king will enter! Who is this majestic king? The Lord of Heaven’s Armies! He is the majestic king!
10 John 19:30 When he had received the sour wine, Jesus said, It is [finished]! Then he bowed his head and gave up his spirit.
11 Song of songs 6:10 Who is this who appears like the dawn? Beautiful as the moon, bright as the sun, awe-inspiring as the stars in procession?
12 Numbers 22:22 Then God’s anger was kindled because [Balaam] went, and the angel of the Lord stood in the road to oppose him. Now he was riding on his donkey and his two servants were with him. And the donkey saw the angel of the Lord standing in the road with his sword drawn in his hand, so the donkey turned aside from the road and went into the field.
13 Zechariah 3:3-5 Now Joshua was dressed in filthy clothes as he stood there before the angel. The angel spoke up to those standing all around, Remove his filthy clothes. Then he said to Joshua, I have freely forgiven your iniquity and will dress you in fine clothing. Then I spoke up, Let a clean turban be put on his head. So they put a clean turban on his head and clothed him, while the angel of the Lord stood nearby.
14 Revelation 5:6 Then I[, John,] saw standing in the middle of the throne and of the four living creatures, and in the middle of the elders, a Lamb that appeared to have been killed. He had seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven spirits of God sent out into all the earth.
15 Song of songs 5:10-16 My beloved is dazzling and ruddy; he stands out in comparison to all other men. His head is like the purest gold. His hair is curly black like a raven. His eyes are like doves by streams of water, washed in milk, mounted like jewels. His cheeks are like garden beds full of balsam trees yielding perfume. His lips are like lilies dripping with drops of myrrh. His arms are like rods of gold set with chrysolite. His abdomen is like polished ivory inlaid with sapphires. His legs are like pillars of marble set on bases of pure gold. His appearance is like Lebanon, choice as its cedars. His mouth is very sweet; he is totally desirable. This is my beloved! This is my companion, O maidens of Jerusalem!
16 Luke 23:43 And Jesus said to him: I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in paradise.
17 John 14:2 There are many dwelling places in my Father’s house.
18 Isaiah 8:18 Look, I and the sons whom the Lord has given me are reminders and object lessons in Israel, sent from the Lord of Heaven’s Armies, who lives on Mount Zion.
19 Luke 23:39-43 One of the criminals who was hanging there railed at [Jesus], saying, Aren’t you the Christ? Save yourself and us! But the other rebuked him, saying, Don’t you fear God, since you are under the same sentence of condemnation? And we rightly so, for we are getting what we deserve for what we did, but this man has done nothing wrong. Then he said, Jesus, remember me when you come in your kingdom. And Jesus said to him, I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in paradise.
20 Pliny to Cæsar Tiberius
21 Luke 13:20-21 Again [Jesus] said, To what should I compare the kingdom of God? 21 It is like yeast that a woman took and mixed with three measures of flour until all the dough had risen.
22 Romans 13:1-5 Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except by God’s appointment, and the authorities that exist have been instituted by God. So the person who resists such authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will incur judgment (for rulers cause no fear for good conduct but for bad). Do you desire not to fear authority? Do good and you will receive its commendation because it is God’s servant for your well-being. But be afraid if you do wrong because government does not bear the sword for nothing. It is God’s servant to administer punishment on the person who does wrong. Therefore it is necessary to be in subjection, not only because of the wrath of the authorities but also because of your conscience.
23 Titus 3:1 Remind them to be subject to rulers and authorities, to be obedient, to be ready for every good work.
24 1 Timothy 2:1-2 First of all, then, I[, Paul,] urge that requests, prayers, intercessions, and thanks be offered on behalf of all people, even for kings and all who are in authority, that we may lead a peaceful and quiet life in all godliness and dignity.
25 25/09/2018 article: China cracks down on religion, crosses burned at Christian churches, Xi Jinping photos installed.
26 John 19:18 There [the authorities] crucified [Jesus] along with two others, one on each side, with Jesus in the middle.
27 Mark 15:31 Those who passed by defamed [Jesus], shaking their heads and saying, Aha! You who can destroy the temple and rebuild it in three days, 30 save yourself and come down from the cross! In the same way even the chief priests together with the experts in the law were mocking him among themselves: He saved others, but he cannot save himself! Let the Christ, the king of Israel, come down from the cross now, that we may see and believe! Those who were crucified with him also spoke abusively to him.
28 Luke 23:39 One of the criminals who was hanging there railed at him, saying, Aren’t you the Christ? Save yourself and us! But the other rebuked him, saying, Don’t you fear God, since you are under the same sentence of condemnation? And we rightly so, for we are getting what we deserve for what we did, but this man has done nothing wrong. Then he said, Jesus, remember me when you come in your kingdom. And Jesus said to him, I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in paradise.
29 1 Timothy 2:1-2 First of all, then, I urge that requests, prayers, intercessions, and thanks be offered on behalf of all people, even for kings and all who are in authority, that we may lead a peaceful and quiet life in all godliness and dignity.
30 Apologies to anyone whose copyrights Coco may have inadvertently infringed.
Minor alterations, denoted by words in brackets, have been made to the scripture quotations, which have been quoted without their context, in order to provide the correct contextual meaning.

Scripture quoted by permission. All scripture quotations, unless otherwise indicated, are taken from the NET Bible® copyright ©1996-2018 by Biblical Studies Press, L.L.C. All rights reserved.

AT

AT: what can one say?

AT and Coco worked together for twenty years or so apart from a brief period when he escaped to a competitor firm, so you might think that I have a few tall tales to tell about him. Well, perhaps sadly I must say no. AT is so well behaved that it would be impossible to find even a single strange hair on his shoulder. That said however, when he was the custodian of some very fine white cats, you did have to be careful if you happened to use his chair in the office.

So then, just so that you know where I am going there are three things that Coco has to say about AT:
His coding
His language
His demeanour.

Coding

Like all young men who walked into AA’s workplace in Surrey’s fields AT was required to do many things. He proved adept at writing code. Unlike some, he would fill his code with comments explaining why he had done something, what was expected to happen and what the necessary preconditions for success were.

We all had to admit that his code worked. It would never fail, indeed it could never fail, providing you had precisely the correct starting conditions and sometimes, but not always, precisely the correct data. If there were anything unexpected in the data…..

…. you then discover that you had been relying on whether or not AT had set a particular flag in a random piece of code, which may or may not have run. Or perhaps he had defined a variable, which is so beloved of programmers, which happened to have the same name as the range that you were addressing, or perhaps he had moved your favourite cursor from the A sheet to another random location. If it were a good day you might have seen an error message which suggested what you needed to look for, on a bad day you watch the edifice come down into a mysterious heap of electronic dust.

You could say that AT’s coding and his approach to coding taught us a great deal. It also prompted the system team to provide us with additional tools to clean up after ourselves.

But AT had imagination, which he used to good effect. He always had in interest in getting different things to talk together, so we had internet data collection tools in the days when the internet was little more than an expensive toy, which were crafter lovingly by the hand of the Grand Master of ‘I can write this code, and indeed any code, to do precisely one job’. Later when we had to make it do two, he became the knight in shining armour to show us how it could have been written to do that, but as it was not, it would now have to be re-written from scratch using a completely different set of tools. As we have seem recently with the upgrade from v5 to v6 of Data Import. V5 and v6 are a world apart, but without his vision for it and his determination to make v5 work, v6 would never have seen the light of day.

Language

Now the use of the English language by AT would put all but the most erudite of scholars to shame; that cannot have escaped your attention. How taught us how to put words together mostly in a meaningful way, so if you wish to attribute blame to anyone for the brevity of this eulogy, then it should not be to the orator, he is merely repeating, please do not misunderstand that, what he has been taught. We used to say of AT tat if something could be said in many different ways, then it is no waste of breath to use them all. At least if you take that approach you have more chance that you will get your message across, and you will have been understood at least in part, in not in the whole.

There was no sense with AT that he wasted his words. Words convey meaning; words are there to be used not to sit idly in a dictionary, so make use of them, and use as many of them as you possibly can as often as you can.

Now for some of us, that is an effort and requires generous preparation, hence an enormous bundle of paper is required to prepare for even the briefest of presentations, but the remarkable thing about AT was that he could do this without taking a breath, and as if he had been rehearsing what he was going to say for weeks even when he had just made it up on the spot.

And finally we turn to his

Demeanour

There is a certain humility about AT. Some people like to tell you about everything they are doing, how well it is going and what other people think about it. Some people can be full of themselves – Coco knows too well how much he suffers from this – but AT presented himself in a modest way. He is confident in his abilities, and he certainly has them. He is superbly competent! But he is more than competent. Perhaps Coco should say that if anything else is going on underneath it should be left for him to say not for others. He never speaks with a ‘look at me and what I have done’ attitude, but rather with a sense that conveys the idea that nothing at all would have been achieved if you had not also been involved. He would belittle himself in order to lift others up.

Finally, one cannot leave without remembering that it was chocolate and coffee that ensured that the wheels of his vivid, exact, far-sighted and innovative imagination ran with the utmost efficiency. In such a world, there were never any failures, only opportunities to learn, to improve and to overcome all the obstacles and hurdles that human generated data could, not to mention the detritus of only partially removed half-baked non-data, present to the unsuspecting coder.

Saul

The recent events, yes in France but also elsewhere, reminded Coco of something. Before he was crucified that the Lord, Jesus Christ, spoke to his disciples and having told them that he was leaving them he went on to say: I have told you this beforehand so that you are not discouraged. They will throw you out of their synagogues, yes, and the hour will come that everyone who kills you will think that by doing so he brings a service to God. And this they will do, because they know neither the Father nor me. But I have told you this, so that when the time comes you will remember that I told you. I did not tell you this at the beginning because I was with you [but now I am leaving you]. (ref 1)

There was one man, among many, who believed these words and he became a persecutor of the followers of Jesus Christ. This man thought that he could serve God and if anyone qualified for heaven then he did. He described himself as circumcised on the 8th day, an Israeli of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of the Hebrews, concerning the law a Pharisee [not our modern understanding of that word, but a genuinely good man, who sought to do what was right – good words can be corrupted over time. He wanted to do what was right. He wanted to keep the law. He wanted to please God.], concerning zeal a persecutor of the called [the followers of Jesus], concerning righteousness before the law, blameless. (ref 2)

His name was Saul. Some people think they have something in terms of religion to boast about. Saul had far more. He pursued his own righteousness – or perhaps better expressed in terms that are understood more easily today, he sought to please God by what he did. There are people now in this world who think in the same way. They are pursuing their own righteousness by the works that they do, and they think killing is one of those good things to do.

But do you know? Saul changed. The Lord Jesus met him. Luke’s record in Acts chapter 9 opens with these fearful words – I love Luther’s words: Saulus aber schnaubte noch mit Drohen und Morden. It is so much more emphatic than the English: Then Saul, still breathing out threats and murder against the disciples of the Lord, … You may read the rest yourself. (ref 3)

Years later he reflected upon his earlier attitude and writing then under the name of Paul, he expressed himself in a very different way in his letter to the Roman believers: I encourage you brethren in the light of the mercy of God to bring your bodies as living sacrifices, holy, well-pleasing to God, which is your reasonable service. (ref 4)

He was wrong once and he knew it. In this short encouragement he uses the same word that the Lord used when speaking with his disciples. It is service (λατρειαν – if you want to know). Was he thinking about those words which Jesus spoke? Well we have more than one reason to think that he had heard Jesus preaching. It is also not unreasonable to think that Saul may even have spoken with the Lord. It is as if he is saying here: Look, I was wrong. It is not service to offer their dead bodies to God, but to offer yourselves as living sacrifices – therefore, he says, that is your reasonable, that is your logical service. That is what you must conclude having read so much in this letter to the Romans about the mercy of God, you must now reach this conclusion that this is your reasonable service to offer your bodies as living sacrifices.

Is this not wonderful? There are people around today who think in just the same way that Saul once did. They think that they offer service to God by killing the servants of Jesus Christ, but the wonderful thing is that God no longer wants dead sacrifices – sheep, goats and the like – he wants you a living sacrifice to live your life out to the glory of his name by the power of the Holy Spirit in name of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Now that sacrifice is something worth living for. And if a man like Saul can see it, so can they and so can you.

Refs:

  1. John 16:1-4
  2. Philippians 3:5-6
  3. Acts 9 Luther 1964 revision
  4. Romans 12:1

You may read more elsewhere here of Saul the Pharisee! and about Living Sacrifice.

Living sacrifice

Thinking about what Paul had said the other day…

I was thinking one day about what Paul had said in his letter to the Romans in the section we call chapter 12, which may be read at Bible Gateway:

I encourage you brethren in the light of the mercy of God to bring your bodies as living sacrifices, holy, well-pleasing to God, which is your reasonable service.

I was puzzling over the translation of the words reasonable service, which some translate as spiritual worship. How could they get this translation out of the words that Paul used? Apparently it is all down to Chrysostom, who lived much closer to Paul than we do of course, but I still fail to see it. I must confess however that on the surface it appears to be a better thing to say than reasonable service. Who would not want to offer to God spiritual worship? After all, did not Jesus say to the woman at the well in Samaria: the hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshippers will worship the Father in spirit and truth; for the Father is seeking such to worship him. God is Spirit, and those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth. John 4:23-24 NKJV

Paul was very careful with his words and not unwilling to coin his own where the meaning would be exact and, literally here, quite cutting: κατατομην, so when he used λογικην λατρειαν was he also not being precise? There are other perfectly good words for spirit (πνευμα) and worship (προσκυνεω), which Paul did not use. Why then would we think to ourselves that he meant otherwise than he actually said?.

So then coming back, worship (προσκυνεω) is not the word Paul uses. He uses a different word: λατρειαν. This is nothing to do with what you might think – that is a Latin word, this one is Greek. I looked it up. The Lord used the same word when speaking to his disciples: whoever kills you will think that he offers God service John 16:2 – or he brings a service to God. Surely, that word must have cut Paul, for he used to think in that way himself. Did he indeed have those words of the Lord in mind when he wrote this? Look, he says, I was wrong. It is not service to offer their dead bodies to God, but to offer yourselves as living sacrifices – THEREFORE, he says, that is your reasonable, that is your logical service. That is what you must conclude having read so much in this letter to the Romans, you must now reach this conclusion that this is your reasonable service. But note, it is not worship. This same word is used in Revelation 7:15 of those who serve before the throne of God day and night. In Old Testament terms these are those who do all of the ‘ordinary’ jobs around the temple in order that the temple may function as a temple. When they fall to worship the other word proskuneo is used (Rev 4:10). The word used here in Romans 12:1, which some of our translations render worship in fact only refers to the service, the acts, the deeds, the things we do which are a part of worship.

Is this not wonderful? There are people around today who think in just the same way that Saul did. They think that they offer service to God by killing the servants of Jesus Christ. Just as an aside, surely if their god were not impotent he would not need their help to do this? But to come back to the point, the wonderful thing is that God no longer wants dead sacrifices – sheep, goats and the like – he wants you a living sacrifice to live your life out to the glory of his name by the power of the Holy Spirit in name of the Lord Jesus Christ. Now that is something worth living for.

There was something else interesting about Paul which I had not noticed. Perhaps a failure to put two and two together on my part. Our pastor was speaking on the words from the same letter to the Romans: What shall we say then? Is the law sin? Certainly not! On the contrary, I would not have known sin except through the law. For I would not have known covetousness unless the law had said, ‘You shall not covet.’ But sin, taking opportunity by the commandment, produced in me all manner of evil desire. For apart from the law sin was dead. I was alive once without the law, but when the commandment came, sin revived and I died. And the commandment, which was to bring life, I found to bring death. For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, deceived me, and by it killed me. Therefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy and just and good. Romans 7:7-12 NKJV

Here Paul tells us that the sin that caught him out was covetousness. He was able to say, and I am quite sure that there were enough people who knew him who would not let him get away with it if it were not true that he was concerning the righteousness which is in the law, blameless. Philippians 3:6.

Now a young man once came to Jesus and went away with a very heavy heart. This young man wanted to know how to obtain eternal life: ‘Good Teacher, what good thing shall I do that I may have eternal life?” So Jesus said to him, ‘Why do you call me good? No one is good but One, that is, God. But if you want to enter into life, keep the commandments.’ He said to him, ‘Which ones?’ Jesus said, ‘You shall not murder; you shall not commit adultery; you shall not steal; you shall not bear false witness; honour your father and your mother and you shall love your neighbour as yourself.’ The young man said to him, ‘All these things I have kept from my youth. What do I still lack?’ Jesus said to him, ‘If you want to be perfect, go, sell what you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow me.’ But when the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful, for he had great possessions. Matthew 19:16-22 NKJV

Jesus deliberately left out ‘you shall not covet‘. You see although the young man was rich, and he had no need of anything, he coveted what he had. You can see from his response that he was not willing to share it. He coveted it for himself. Is it any wonder that such a young man would not many years later be found persecuting the followers of Jesus Christ. He wanted to establish his own righteousness by keeping the law, but the harder he tried the more the command ‘you shall not covet‘ stuck in his throat and like a rabid dog it would not leave him alone. He railed against it. He wanted his own righteousness, but he could not get it. And he hated those who claimed that Jesus had offered himself as a sacrifice to fulfill and replace all of the law. Now they talked about Jesus having fulfilled the law for them. Saul would have none of it. It was in his mind blasphemy, but in reality he knew. He could not avoid the force of the commandment which said ‘you shall not covet‘.

Then one day the Lord met him. Instead of offering service to God by forcing the followers of Jesus Christ to apostacise, he offered himself as a living sacrifice to God and discovered what reasonable service to God was.

May you also discover what it is to serve the Lord as Paul did.

Think about it.

Then Saul, still breathing threats and murder against the disciples of the Lord, went to the high priest and asked letters from him to the synagogues of Damascus, so that if he found any who were of the Way, whether men or women, he might bring them bound to Jerusalem.

As he journeyed he came near Damascus, and suddenly a light shone around him from heaven. Then he fell to the ground, and heard a voice saying to him, ‘Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me?’ And he said, ‘Who are you, Lord?’ Then the Lord said, ‘I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting. It is hard for you to kick against the goads.’ So he, trembling and astonished, said, ‘Lord, what do you want me to do?’ Then the Lord said to him, ‘Arise and go into the city, and you will be told what you must do.’ And the men who journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice but seeing no one. Then Saul arose from the ground, and when his eyes were opened he saw no one. But they led him by the hand and brought him into Damascus. And he was three days without sight, and neither ate nor drank.

Now there was a certain disciple at Damascus named Ananias; and to him the Lord said in a vision, ‘Ananias.’And he said, ‘Here I am, Lord.’ So the Lord said to him, ‘Arise and go to the street called Straight, and inquire at the house of Judas for one called Saul of Tarsus, for behold, he is praying. And in a vision he has seen a man named Ananias coming in and putting his hand on him, so that he might receive his sight.’ Then Ananias answered, ‘Lord, I have heard from many about this man, how much harm he has done to your saints in Jerusalem. And here he has authority from the chief priests to bind all who call on your name.’ But the Lord said to him, “Go, for he is a chosen vessel of mine to bear my name before Gentiles, kings, and the children of Israel. For I will show him how many things he must suffer for my name’s sake.’

And Ananias went his way and entered the house; and laying his hands on him he said, ‘Brother Saul, the Lord Jesus, who appeared to you on the road as you came, has sent me that you may receive your sight and be filled with the Holy Spirit.’ Immediately there fell from his eyes something like scales, and he received his sight at once; and he arose and was baptized. So when he had received food, he was strengthened. Then Saul spent some days with the disciples at Damascus.

Immediately he preached the Christ in the synagogues, that he is the Son of God. Acts 9:1-20 NKJV

The use of the rainbow

saw that the rainbow had become quite popular…

I noticed a rainbow and remembered what the Lord had said to Noah (you can read about more it here or at Bible Gateway):

I set my rainbow in the cloud, and it shall be the sign of the covenant between me and the earth. It shall be, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the rainbow shall be seen in the cloud; and I will remember my covenant which is between me and you and every living creature of all flesh; the waters shall never again become a flood to destroy all flesh.

The rainbow is a sign of great comfort to us, for God says that when he sees it he will remember his covenant, and we may know that he will not destroy the world again by water, but it is also a sign of great terror, for as Peter reminds us in his second letter we forget that the earth of old was destroyed by the flood. The rainbow reminds us of this, and tells us that our Lord Jesus is coming again, and that though this world will not be destroyed by a flood, it will perish in fire. He will keep his promise to come back. In the meantime we must yield to him, who, like the ark that Noah built was the only thing that could save from the flood, he is the only one who can save us from this fire.

So think about it.

⁸Then God spoke to Noah and to his sons with him, saying: ⁹And as for Me, behold, I establish My covenant with you and with your descendants after you, ¹⁰and with every living creature that is with you: the birds, the cattle, and every beast of the earth with you, of all that go out of the ark, every beast of the earth. ¹¹Thus I establish My covenant with you: Never again shall all flesh be cut off by the waters of the flood; never again shall there be a flood to destroy the earth.

¹²And God said: This is the sign of the covenant which I make between Me and you, and every living creature that is with you, for perpetual generations: ¹³I set My rainbow in the cloud, and it shall be for the sign of the covenant between Me and the earth. ¹⁴It shall be, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the rainbow shall be seen in the cloud; ¹⁵and I will remember My covenant which is between Me and you and every living creature of all flesh; the waters shall never again become a flood to destroy all flesh. ¹⁶The rainbow shall be in the cloud, and I will look on it to remember the everlasting covenant between God and every living creature of all flesh that is on the earth. ¹⁷And God said to Noah, This is the sign of the covenant which I have established between Me and all flesh that is on the earth.

Freedom

What is freedom?

Is this freedom?

Free to go

“Apologies, but yes, you are free to go.” barked the sergeant from behind the almost closed door, whose covering of paint did nothing to hide the rich golden orange varnish which had at the first been applied to its timber and thus betrayed the not so humble origins of the previous inhabitants of the house.

“Ah! those words! ‘You are free to go.'” They echoed briefly in the large, otherwise empty, room, and hung for a moment high in the air. Then came the devastating, crushing silence once more.

“But where shall I go?”

After twenty seven years and 198 days and seven hours and fifty minutes in Trudovoy Lager #3, Alexis Vertinskya had lost all sense of what it was proper to do in the place to which he was now free to go. Forty three of those latest minutes had been spent on the other side of the door from the sergeant waiting for an answer to his question, whether then, after he had served in full the sentence that had been handed down to him, it might be considered possible, just possible you must understand, that they might be considering when he may be allowed to leave.

He walked slowly along what he remembered as a once cobbled road, but which now was strangely covered in a thin layer of poor quality tar scarcely disguising the rough stones which lay beneath. After 24 paces, exactly 22.5 metres – he had spent much of his time perfecting the techniques of measurement, the carefully measured step mixed with counting to subdivide each pace into pacim (‘1 pace = 10 pacim’ he whispered to himself as if he might have forgotten it) in the Lager #3. He knew how long each corridor was, the dimensions of each room, the width of each gallery, and even where the hidden doors were, whose presence could not be detected except by inference from putting together in his mind a plan of the whole building. He had confirmed the presence of three of these doors to himself, two more remained undetected, but he knew where to look – and now exactly 22.5 metres down the lane he turned around. The open door beckoned to him…

British hater?

Ultimately the question is not going to be: Did you hate Britain?

Did you hate Jesus Christ?

You may think that that is a strange question. When you consider the life of the Lord, Jesus Christ, many people will say how could you possibly hate him? He went about doing good, teaching people, healing people, casting out their demons. Even the liberal theologians, Arians of a variety of colours, races and ethnicity, and atheists acknowledge that he was in every, or at least many, respects a remarkable person who deserves no little respect for how he conducted himself whilst he walked upon this earth in his mortal flesh.

But to show someone respect is not the same as to love them. And to hate someone does not preclude the giving of respect to them.

What then is the answer to the question?

Before going there, what was the point of asking whether someone hated Britain or not? Why did they think it mattered? Is the answer not something to do with nationalism – or as the Italians are not ashamed to call it nazionalismo – whether the answer to the question is yes or no, the very asking of the question derives from nazism. If my answer to the question Do I hate Britain? is No, then I may quite rightly be called a nationalist, that is to say a nazi. In the late twentieth and now the 21st centuries that has become an epithet which no English speaking man would want to be written on his memorial. ‘He loved his land. He was a nationalist. Era un nazi[onalista]. He was a nazi.’ But if my answer is Yes, then what? I am villified by the press as a man who has no right to live and remain in that land.

You wish to quibble with me, don’t you? To be a lover of your country is not to be a nazi. I am sorry, but it is. There is no getting away from the fact that that is what a nazi is and is what is a nazi. He loved his nation. Amava la sua nazione. Egli era un nazionalista. He was a nazi.

The point of this, is not to prove whether or not you are a Nazi, in the much more narrow and restricted sense in which the word has come to be used in the English language, but to show that ultimately the question Do you love Britian? or its counterpart Do you hate Britain? or indeed any other country, land, nation, sovereign state, federation or empire for such things are not coextensive, there are nations within federations and nations across countries, and even nations within nations, is not of such significance that it really matters, for whatever the answer to the question there will be others who will give a different answer for different reasons, though they may both enjoy the same rights, privileges, upbringing ethnicity and legal status.

So to return to the real question: Did you hate Jesus Christ?

I have already suggested that it is difficult not to give him respect and recognize his goodness, but to say that I love him? Well that is an entirely different matter indeed. But unless you love him, you do in fact hate him. Why do I say that and what evidence is there to support and prove that?

Do I love him?
How do I know?
Am I against him?
Am I for him?
What did he say?
If you love me…
Many will say to me….

Now you may dispute with me and say, but did he not himself say: he who is not against me is for me?

Finally, there is a connection between this question and the one asked in the press: do you hate Britain? The Lord said to Cæsar’s captain: Is that what you say or have others told you? My kingdom is not of this world. If it were my disciples would rise up and fight.

My kingdom is not of this world tells us that he does have a kingdom, and so the question becomes: do you hate Britain or do you hate his kingdom? A man cannot serve two masters. He cannot own allegience to two countries¹. So do you owe allegience to the kingdom of the Lord, Jesus Christ, or do you refuse him allegience and prefer one of the kingdoms of this world? If you prefer this world, you do not love him. If you prefer his kingdom then you have in the strictest sense of the word, hated this world and the kingdom into which you were born.

So then, a better eulogy for your memorial than ‘He loved his land. He was a nationalist.’ would be ‘He loved the Lord. He loved the kingdom of God. He hated Britain.’ but no-one would ever write that, would they?

The psalmist, speaking of the kingdom of God, wrote:

¹His foundation is in the holy mountains. ²The LORD loves the gates of Zion more than all the dwellings of Jacob. ³Glorious things are spoken of you, O city of God! ⁴’I will make mention of Rahab and Babylon to those who know me; behold, O Philistia and Tyre, with Ethiopia: ‘This one was born there.’ ‘ ⁵And of Zion it will be said, ‘This one and that one were born in her; and the Most High himself shall establish her.’ ⁶ The LORD will record, when he registers the peoples: ‘This one was born there.’ ⁷Both the singers and the players on instruments say, ‘All my springs of joy are in you.’ Psalm 87


¹I beg to differ over the attitudes of some of the countries of the Commonwealth for it is possible to own allegience to more than one for allegience in those states is allegience to the one common head of the states not to the states themselves. Sadly holding to such a doctrine is political suicide in this so called enlightened age (a misonomer – the enlightenment is over two hundred years old) or modern (another! we are living in a post-modern (and post Christian) society. Modernism is also now a centenarian.) society.

The folly

The pacific galaxy of languages may be extraordinary

Bure da! Wie geht’s, s’il te plait?

Now wouldn’t you think I was a bit of a Dummkopf if I came up to you in the street and started talking to you like that? Well, there was a day when something like that happened, and it was not just one man who did it, there were hundreds if not thousands who suddenly found that they could not understand the man who was working next to them.

The Bible tells us what happened in Genesis 11¹, which you may read below. The corroboration for what happened on that day, about 5ky ago, is all around us today, and is found in every record we have of human civilisation. Evolutionists would have us believe that our languages derived from the babblings of animals and gradually became the complex languages we have today. Sadly, for them, the evidence is against it. Far from languages becoming more complex, languages have become much more simple. English is a relatively simple language compared with most other languages, but it has not always been so, and the other languages of Europe in the main have been derived from the far more complex languages of ancient Greece and Rome. We also find that languages appear in history fully formed. There is no halfway house where a language is struggling to find expression.

But what we find in the experience of men is exactly what we would expect to find when we look at what the Bible says actually happened – and remember that the Bible was written by men who were there, who saw what took place. So then Genesis 11: This is somewhere around 3-500 years after the flood.

Now notice that this is a judgement of God on men. The fact that you cannot understand what people are saying when you visit Paris – or even some parts of Wales – is evidence of this that God is angry with us and has already judged us. You see God has left us without any excuse. We cannot say to him, I did not know you were angry. Just as he left evidence of the flood everywhere over the earth, so also he has left evidence of this judgement everywhere over the earth.

But notice also that in this judgement God is merciful. He had promised Noah that he would not send another great flood over the earth. He simply confused our languages so that men run away from one another and become scattered. Can you imagine the devastation and chaos that that would cause? But God kept his word. He had other things in mind, he knew that one day he would send a Saviour to undo all of the evil that men had done and pay the penalty for it.

And so it was about a week after Jesus went into heaven he sent his Spirit and the disciples who were together in Jerusalem at that time found themselves speaking languages that they did not know, so that all the strangers and visitors to Jerusalem could understand what these simple men were saying in their own language. Again that is in the Bible in the New Testament Acts 2².

You see in his Son, Jesus Christ, God is undoing the judgements that men deserve. I told you last time about the dreadful day of judgement that is coming. It is far more terrible than men have ever seen or could ever imagine, but that same judgement day sees the renewal of everything that there is. This old earth will be transformed into something far more wonderful than anything we can ever imagine, where God’s people shall live in peace for ever. The language barriers that we see around us today will be gone. Whether we will all speak one language or whether we will speak many different languages and pick and choose the best one for what we want to say at any time, who knows? We don’t know yet, but we do know this, it will be well worth getting there.

And God has provided the way. On the day when God began to undo the language barriers the people who heard Peter preach asked him: What shall we do? Peter said: Repent and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the cancellation of sins! The promise is to you – to all – as many as the Lord calls³.

So then, we are without excuse. The evidence of God’s anger is all around us, but he has given us a way of escape – follow Jesus. Turn from your sins and trust him. He will save you. No one else can.

¹ Now the whole earth had one language and one speech. ²And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar, and they dwelt there. ³Then they said to one another, “Come, let us make bricks and bake them thoroughly.” They had brick for stone, and they had asphalt for mortar. ⁴And they said, “Come, let us build ourselves a city, and a tower whose top is in the heavens; let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be scattered abroad over the face of the whole earth.” ⁵But the LORD came down to see the city and the tower which the sons of men had built. ⁶And the LORD said, “Indeed the people are one and they all have one language, and this is what they begin to do; now nothing that they propose to do will be withheld from them. ⁷Come, let us go down and there confuse their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech.” ⁸So the LORD scattered them abroad from there over the face of all the earth, and they ceased building the city. ⁹Therefore its name is called Babel, because there the LORD confused the language of all the earth; and from there the LORD scattered them abroad over the face of all the earth. Genesis 11:1-9

² Now when the Day of Pentecost had fully come, they were all with one accord in one place. ²And suddenly there came a sound from heaven, as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled the whole house where they were sitting. ³Then there appeared to them divided tongues, as of fire, and one sat upon each of them. ⁴And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.
⁵And there were dwelling in Jerusalem Jews, devout men, from every nation under heaven. ⁶And when this sound occurred, the multitude came together, and were confused, because everyone heard them speak in his own language. ⁷ Then they were all amazed and marvelled, saying to one another, “Look, are not all these who speak Galileans? ⁸And how is it that we hear, each in our own language in which we were born? ⁹Parthians and Medes and Elamites, those dwelling in Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia, ¹⁰Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the parts of Libya adjoining Cyrene, visitors from Rome, both Jews and proselytes, ¹¹Cretans and Arabs–we hear them speaking in our own tongues the wonderful works of God.” ¹²So they were all amazed and perplexed, saying to one another, “Whatever could this mean?” ¹³Others mocking said, “They are full of new wine.” Acts 2:1-13

³ “Men and brethren, what shall we do?” ³⁸ Then Peter said to them, “Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. ³⁹ For the promise is to you and to your children, and to all who are afar off, as many as the Lord our God will call.” Acts 2:37-39